Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Lewis Hamilton (merged)
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251
robefc
QUOTE (undersquare @ Nov 8 2010, 12:00) *
I'm still in shock about Hammy yesterday. What happened, is it the brakes? Normally he's the guy who overtook FA at the first corner of his first race, fended off the faster Ferraris for the whole of his second race, Fernando again at Indy, zapped Fisi here to sew up 08, ...

Yesterday we heard Andy on the warm-up lap telling him the brakes were coming up to temperature, then he braked really early into T1 letting Webber by


I keep hearing rumours about brake problems but only on here, I'm assuming macca would have said something if it was true.

I find it hard to believe he was just being cautious in a position where he has far less to lose.

I think it's simply because he doesn't trust the grip in the car at the mo.
f1fastestlap
QUOTE (robefc @ Nov 8 2010, 12:02) *
I keep hearing rumours about brake problems but only on here, I'm assuming macca would have said something if it was true.

I find it hard to believe he was just being cautious in a position where he has far less to lose.

I think it's simply because he doesn't trust the grip in the car at the mo.


MW said it to BBC before the race...
ZooL
His early braking at T1 is surprise.

He could have had Webber and Hulkenburg had he raced like he normally does. But I get the feeling he is scared he might crash and is now holding back.

Maybe he's trying to learn from Button's approach, but he's overdoing the restraint I feel.
robefc
QUOTE (f1fastestlap @ Nov 8 2010, 12:03) *
MW said it to BBC before the race...


What did he say?
tifosiMac
QUOTE (aditya-now @ Nov 8 2010, 09:49) *
Only in your mind. Point is that Lewis has been cracking the last two races whenever Alonso was in his rear mirrors - consequently making a driving mistake and losing position to Fernando. That has nothing to do with an inferior machine but everything to do with Lewis cracking under Fernando´s pressure.

That´s why I said, it seems the Hamilton/Alonso game is turned on its head.

I think you're drawing your own assumptions on that one.
peroa
QUOTE (ZooL @ Nov 8 2010, 13:04) *
His early braking at T1 is surprise.

He could have had Webber and Hulkenburg had he raced like he normally does. But I get the feeling he is scared he might crash and is now holding back.

Maybe he's trying to learn from Button's approach, but he's overdoing the restraint I feel.


I think he simply didn't have the grip to brake late, like he said numerous times during the race.
smitten
QUOTE (ZooL @ Nov 8 2010, 12:04) *
He could have had Webber and Hulkenburg had he raced like he normally does. But I get the feeling he is scared he might crash and is now holding back.


He has been right royally pilloried on here for the accident with Webber at Singapore (not fairly I feel, but that is in another thread). Hulk had nothing to lose, but a DNF for Hamilton would have ended his season - I can understand why he was cautious. When you look at both Korea and Brazil, both McLarens appear to have had issues with braking after the start/restart. Overcautious? maybe, but I can understand why even if I'd prefer him to be more aggressive.
swerved
QUOTE (aditya-now @ Nov 8 2010, 09:08) *
That´s correct, Lewis doesn´t seem up to Fernando anymore - that´s now already two races in a row that Lewis cracks under Fernando´s pressure and gets overtaken.

It seems the Hamilton-Alonso game is turned on its head, it´s not Lewis anymore who has the command.



The irony is, that in the pre-race build up, Hamilton suggested that that might be Alono's "weak spot" (seeing Hamilton in his mirrors) roflmao.gif
tohru222
In the last two races Hamilton got owned by Alonso. Just consider how would the championship look if he finished ahead of Alonso in those two races..
as65p
QUOTE (peroa @ Nov 8 2010, 13:08) *
I think he simply didn't have the grip to brake late, like he said numerous times during the race.


Plus if he had specific brake issues, I'm inclined to believe he would have included that in one of his complaints to the pits. Yesterday he didn't sound like holding back on any "issues" over the radio... heck, he even invented one with the non-working f-duct tongue.gif . Pretty cruel to be corrected so swiftly in the response from the engineer, though biggrin.gif .
as65p
QUOTE (swerved @ Nov 8 2010, 13:11) *
The irony is, that in the pre-race build up, Hamilton suggested that that might be Alono's "weak spot" (seeing Hamilton in his mirrors) roflmao.gif


Really? Shame I missed that.
robefc
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:16) *
Plus if he had specific brake issues, I'm inclined to believe he would have included that in one of his complaints to the pits. Yesterday he didn't sound like holding back on any "issues" over the radio... heck, he even invented one with the non-working f-duct tongue.gif . Pretty cruel to be corrected so swiftly in the response from the engineer, though biggrin.gif .


Grrrrrr, he simply asked a question.
velgajski1
QUOTE (tohru222 @ Nov 8 2010, 13:14) *
In the last two races Hamilton got owned by Alonso. Just consider how would the championship look if he finished ahead of Alonso in those two races..


1. Earlier in season Alonso got owned by Hamilton. Just consider...
2. Chances to finish those two races higher than Alonso were quite slim.
3. Real spilling of points by Hamilton was done in Monza and Singapore. Thats where he lost 20-30 points by his own fault.
f1fastestlap
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:16) *
Plus if he had specific brake issues, I'm inclined to believe he would have included that in one of his complaints to the pits. Yesterday he didn't sound like holding back on any "issues" over the radio... heck, he even invented one with the non-working f-duct tongue.gif . Pretty cruel to be corrected so swiftly in the response from the engineer, though biggrin.gif .


Didn't you have anything more to lie about?
He asked a question, but as usual from you, you had to twist it to fit in your little agenda...
smitten
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:16) *
heck, he even invented one with the non-working f-duct tongue.gif . Pretty cruel to be corrected so swiftly in the response from the engineer, though biggrin.gif .


Dear god, you'd think he'd just asked his race engineer not to talk to him for the rest of the race rolleyes.gif


as65p
QUOTE (robefc @ Nov 8 2010, 13:17) *
Grrrrrr, he simply asked a question.


Brrrrr, he still mentioned it in the post race interview. smile.gif
smitten
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:20) *
Brrrrr, he still mentioned it in the post race interview. smile.gif


After he had been asked about it by the interviewer. Don't let a few facts get in the way of your campaign now roflmao.gif
Gareth
So the next time something feels wrong on the car he shouldn't ask the question of his engineer?

That would be the stupid thing to do.
as65p
What's up folks?

Even if you come in numbers, bit of a hard task to deny that Hamilton suspected his F-duct not working while it was perfectly okay.

The radio conversation is out for everyone to hear as is the post-race interview. It won't go away.
jjcale
QUOTE (ZooL @ Nov 8 2010, 12:04) *
His early braking at T1 is surprise.

He could have had Webber and Hulkenburg had he raced like he normally does. But I get the feeling he is scared he might crash and is now holding back.


Yup, Monza and Singapore have left a scar.

That said, if he'd been a bit more "scared" in those races he might have pulled off winning the WDC in the 3rd best car!
Gareth
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:25) *
What's up folks?

Even if you come in numbers, bit of a hard task to deny that Hamilton suspected his F-duct not working while it was perfectly okay.

The radio conversation is out for everyone to here as is the post-race interview. It won't go away.

No one's denied he suspected it wasn't working. People are only saying that there was nothing wrong with him asking his engineer about it over the radio if he suspected there was a problem.
smitten
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:25) *
What's up folks?

Even if you come in numbers, bit of a hard task to deny that Hamilton suspected his F-duct not working while it was perfectly okay.


I don't think anybody has denied it, or suggested that it wasn't, in fact, working. rolleyes.gif
swerved
QUOTE (robefc @ Nov 8 2010, 09:48) *
It's always possible he just wanted to race and also realised he had to race in order to improve his chances in the WDC.

Is that not a more likely explanation than hamilton was sitting in his car considering how he can make himself appear 'brave'?


Anything is possible.

I'm not of the opinion he has to think about how he can make himself appear brave, i think its something he does spontaneously.


He is a brave driver, and a very good one, and i rarely have an issue with anyone else saying so, i'm just not a fan of those who blow their own trumpets, the law of averages dictates they'll fall on their asses.

I also dont hold with the whole BBC bias rubbish, we've had many items featuring Hamilton, him driving Jake round, him playing computer games, him showing us around Woking etc, yet to read the comments of some on here the BBC's input is "Lewis Who?"
robefc
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:20) *
Brrrrr, he still mentioned it in the post race interview. smile.gif


That wasn't when he was apparently 'corrected by his engineer' though was it.

Anyhow, have your fun, I realise he annoys/amuses you and gives you plenty of ammunition even if you still feel the need to twist it as negatively as possible.
jjcale
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:25) *
What's up folks?

Even if you come in numbers, bit of a hard task to deny that Hamilton suspected his F-duct not working while it was perfectly okay.

The radio conversation is out for everyone to here as is the post-race interview. It won't go away.


I'd call you out for trolling but I realise you dont get the BBC feed so you did not hear his post race interview where he explained why he asked the question ... but anyway, please chill with the baiting... its not a nice thing to do... and it definitely is not necessary.
Obi Offiah
QUOTE (aditya-now @ Nov 8 2010, 11:49) *
That´s why I said, it seems the Hamilton/Alonso game is turned on its head.

Difference is they are not in equal machinary, I think you left that aspect out.
as65p
QUOTE (Gareth @ Nov 8 2010, 13:28) *
No one's denied he suspected it wasn't working. People are only saying that there was nothing wrong with him asking his engineer about it over the radio if he suspected there was a problem.


QUOTE (smitten @ Nov 8 2010, 13:28) *
I don't think anybody has denied it, or suggested that it wasn't, in fact, working. rolleyes.gif


Then what's the problem with me mentioning it?
robefc
QUOTE (swerved @ Nov 8 2010, 12:28) *
Anything is possible.

I'm not of the opinion he has to think about how he can make himself appear brave, i think its something he does spontaneously.


He is a brave driver, and a very good one, and i rarely have an issue with anyone else saying so, i'm just not a fan of those who blow their own trumpets, the law of averages dictates they'll fall on their asses.

I also dont hold with the whole BBC bias rubbish, we've had many items featuring Hamilton, him driving Jake round, him playing computer games, him showing us around Woking etc, yet to read the comments of some on here the BBC's input is "Lewis Who?"


I have no problem with that but I struggle to see how your example of korea fits in unless he was saying 'start the race, I'm awesome and will overtake everyone. they're all wimps'.

At a time when everybody moans about the drivers being wimps (which is nonsense imo) it's fun to see hamilton criticised for wanting to start a race and have it twisted into him boasting.
Gareth
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:30) *
Then what's the problem with me mentioning it?

You said he "invented" an issue - not true, he suspected one so asked about it.

You said that the response of his engineer was a "correction" - not true, he was asking if it was working, being told it is working is not a correction it's an answer.

You considered the quick response "cruel" - not true, getting info back from your engineers quickly is a good thing.

No problem mentioning it, just being accurate whilst doing so would be handy.
Obi Offiah
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 11:54) *
Even if the McLaren was half a second slower than the Ferrari (which the laptimes don't indicate at all, more like a tenth or two), it's perfectly possible for a driver to hold such a car behind, if he makes no significant mistakes. That's what Alonso was doing all race long in Singapore against Vettel, for example.

Yes of course the Singapore and Interlagos circuits are comparable. I wonder what comments from drivers regarding overtaking at Singapore vs Interlagos are. Its also interesting that while Lewis was struggling with grip it was at critical parts of the circuit i.e exiting slow corners. Even while Fernando was being held up by the Williams Lewis was struggling to keep up.
as65p
QUOTE (jjcale @ Nov 8 2010, 13:29) *
I'd call you out for trolling but I realise you dont get the BBC feed so you did not hear his post race interview where he explained why he asked the question ... but anyway, please chill with the baiting... its not a nice thing to do... and it definitely not necessary.


You realize wrong there, and apparently you try and use that wrong assumption to mislead.

He said word for word in the post race iinterview "I didn't think the f-duct was working." That's what I'm saying above. Now what?
smitten
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:35) *
He said word for word in the post race iinterview "I didn't think the f-duct was working." That's what I'm saying above. Now what?


Because he didn't for the reasons he explained in the next sentence or two. Did you have a point?
Buttoneer
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/88039
QUOTE
"The car didn't feel like it did in practice, down the straights particularly. I didn't think the F-duct was working because I was struggling to overtake backmarkers and Fernando shot by on the straight."

Edit; can easily be read as him restating his belief that the F-Duct wasn't working, or confirming his reasons for asking the question. I prefer the latter.
as65p
QUOTE (Gareth @ Nov 8 2010, 13:33) *
You said he "invented" an issue - not true, he suspected one so asked about it.


Well, if you want to go nitpicky... as he said himself "I didn't think it was working.", nothing about suspicion. Of course he inquired the engineer...

QUOTE
You said that the response of his engineer was a "correction" - not true, he was asking if it was working, being told it is working is not a correction it's an answer.


... only to have his thinking proven wrong. IOW corrected.

QUOTE
You considered the quick response "cruel" - not true, getting info back from your engineers quickly is a good thing.


Good and cruel aren't mutually exclusive. Cruel in that it still left him with one possible explanation less for his lack of performance.

QUOTE
No problem mentioning it, just being accurate whilst doing so would be handy.


At your service! wave.gif
as65p
QUOTE (smitten @ Nov 8 2010, 13:38) *
Because he didn't for the reasons he explained in the next sentence or two. Did you have a point?


Always the same, actually, and a simple enough one I'd think.

That he felt his f-duct not working while it clearly was.
Gareth
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:43) *
Cruel in that it still left him with one possible explanation less for his lack of performance.

Ah, you meant cruel that it meant that the McLaren just is fundamentally that slow. My misunderstanding, I thought you were slagging Hamilton (again) for coming on the radio and asking about it.
Buttoneer
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:43) *
Well, if you want to go nitpicky... as he said himself "I didn't think it was working.", nothing about suspicion. Of course he inquired the engineer...

I changed the emphasis. 'Didn't' is not the same as 'don't' which to me turns his response into one of explanation not reiteration.

How's that for nitpicky?
SvenF1
I find it funny when people are complaining that McLaren can't give him a good enough car. Does it need to be 1 sec quicker than others or something before it's good enough? They have given him a championship contending car for 3 of the 4 seasons and a race winning car for every season, so they couldn't have done much better really.

Yeah, it hasn't had the pace of the Red Bulls or the Ferraris for the last 2 races, BUT there were plenty of races where it was infact the fastest car. But those are of course easy to forget..

Also, without his mistakes at Monza and Singapore, Hamilton would be very close if not leading the WDC.
as65p
QUOTE (Gareth @ Nov 8 2010, 13:47) *
Ah, you meant cruel that it meant that the McLaren just is fundamentally that slow. My misunderstanding, I thought you were slagging Hamilton (again) for coming on the radio and asking about it.


Yeah. Evidently the car was fundamentally so slow that it was the fastest through the last, f-duct-heaven, sector at the time of the question.

I understand that not everyone might find that funny, but, shoot me, I did.
ViMaMo
So Lewis chokes again eek.gif
as65p
QUOTE (Buttoneer @ Nov 8 2010, 13:51) *
I changed the emphasis. 'Didn't' is not the same as 'don't' which to me turns his response into one of explanation not reiteration.

How's that for nitpicky?


Brilliant, actually.

Yet... "didn't" means he reiterates that at the time it was a "don't" for him, or not? At least until he was, ahem..., corrected.

wink.gif
Buttoneer
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 13:05) *
Brilliant, actually.

Yet... "didn't" means he reiterates that at the time it was a "don't" for him, or not? At least until he was, ahem..., corrected.

wink.gif

I believe the 'didn't' means at the time he thought the F-duct wasn't working, but says nothing about what he believes now. So yes, reiteration of what he thought at the time, by way of explanation.

Maybe he still thinks that it wasn't working, but we need one of Lewis's mind-readers to tell us this.
rhukkas
QUOTE (SvenF1 @ Nov 8 2010, 12:52) *
I find it funny when people are complaining that McLaren can't give him a good enough car. Does it need to be 1 sec quicker than others or something before it's good enough? They have given him a championship contending car for 3 of the 4 seasons and a race winning car for every season, so they couldn't have done much better really.

Yeah, it hasn't had the pace of the Red Bulls or the Ferraris for the last 2 races, BUT there were plenty of races where it was infact the fastest car. But those are of course easy to forget..

Also, without his mistakes at Monza and Singapore, Hamilton would be very close if not leading the WDC.


There are two races where McLaren had a decent car - Spa and Canada. The rest it was average, and overall this season has been solidly the third best car. Hamilton, has once again, beaten a reigning world champion in the same car. If that level of performance is not going to deliver a world championship at the end of it, then the argument the car isn't good enough is perfectly valid.
hotstickyslick
QUOTE (rhukkas @ Nov 8 2010, 13:16) *
There are two races where McLaren had a decent car - Spa and Canada. The rest it was average, and overall this season has been solidly the third best car. Hamilton, has once again, beaten a reigning world champion in the same car. If that level of performance is not going to deliver a world championship at the end of it, then the argument the car isn't good enough is perfectly valid.

Spa, Canada and Turkey the McLaren was the quickest at.
Coral
Lewis is fed up with McLaren and their slow cars and so am I. He needs a new challenge at a different team. He should take any drive that is offered to him...even a drive at Renault would be preferable to another year at McLaren. I mean the two years at Renault hasn't done Alonso's career any harm. It was sad to see Lewis yesterday, during and after the race, it's as if he has lost his sparkle. cry.gif I want the old Lewis back! He needs a new team...and soon.
undersquare
QUOTE (Coral @ Nov 8 2010, 13:30) *
Lewis is fed up with McLaren and their slow cars and so am I. He needs a new challenge at a different team. He should take any drive that is offered to him...even a drive at Renault would be preferable to another year at McLaren. I mean the two years at Renault hasn't done Alonso's career any harm. It was sad to see Lewis yesterday, during and after the race, it's as if he has lost his sparkle. cry.gif I want the old Lewis back! He needs a new team...and soon.


We have to wait and see what McLaren come up with for next year. IMO they have to have learned from this year that the rules aren't applied rigidly any more and that boundaries can be crossed. The excessive consultation with the FIA has to go, along with the rigid wings. A bit of mild cheating around testing and RRA pays off, evidently. So if they have taken these lessons, the ~26 could be a front runner.

McLaren are a big team about to become a road car manufacturer, long term it's a good bet.

This year only needed a few things to go Lewis' way, like Alonso's wheelnut crossthreading instead of Massa's...

So it's way too soon to give up on them; and there's no spot to go to anyway. Alonso's last 2 years at Renault were just years tossed away IMO, he's not gonna go there.

I would like to see him with more of a personal entourage though. However close he is with the team, he's still a driver FOR the team, he needs some of his own friends with him.
Watkins74
QUOTE (as65p @ Nov 8 2010, 12:46) *
Always the same, actually, and a simple enough one I'd think.

That he felt his f-duct not working while it clearly was.

I am not a Mechanic or an Engineer. Could someone explain to me in simple terms how an F-duct would stop working? Crack in the tube? Debris in the inlet?

Thanks.
ViMaMo
Mclaren+Lewis simply didnt utilize their strengths to the max. He should have won at Monza.

I sure wish Lewis wins at Abu Dhabi.
f1fastestlap
QUOTE (vivian @ Nov 8 2010, 14:07) *
Mclaren+Lewis simply didnt utilize their strengths to the max. He should have won at Monza.


Nonsense.
ViMaMo
QUOTE (f1fastestlap @ Nov 8 2010, 19:38) *
Nonsense.


Oh it was a driver error
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.