Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Renault 2010 (merged)
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196
korzeniow
QUOTE (stonebutter @ Jan 11 2010, 15:21) *
Lets look at their average points per race eliminating races not finished due to mechanical failure. Then you'll get the real picture.


2009:

KUB:
Aaustralia: collision with Vettel
Malezja: engine failure
Monaco: breaks failure
Italy: oil leak


HEI:
Singapur: collision with Sutil
Brasil: out of fuel

2008:

KUB:
Australia: collision with Nakajima
Britain: spun out of track

2007:

KUB:

Australia: gearbox failure
Malaysia: twice broken front wing, puncture, problems with ecu
Canada: collision with Trili, huge crash
USA: out of the race
China: hydraulics

HEI:
Spain: gearboc failure
USA: hydraulics
marcotulio27
QUOTE (stonebutter @ Jan 11 2010, 15:21) *
Lets look at their average points per race eliminating races not finished due to mechanical failure. Then you'll get the real picture.



I'll take that in account, no problem.
But I'd like to say that, as an example of all the "nuances" involved in F1 racing, there was this time Jacques got a penalty (10 places back on the grid I guess) because the BMW TEAM DROPPED HIS ENGINE while transporting. How nice is that?

STATS ARE LIKE BIKINIS, THEY SHOW WHATS SPETACULAR AND HIDE WHATS REALLY IMPORTANT!
Sarhan
Isn't there a separate thread about RK vs NH? why bring the discussion here?
I come here expecting some Renault news just to find this same old story mad.gif

Can the mods do something about it please?

wingwalker
Yes there is and it was linked a few pages back.

Kubica vs. Heidfeld take your arguments, all of which have been said about 1000 times, there.
V8 Fireworks
QUOTE (Owen @ Jan 11 2010, 12:04) *
Not sure the website is at the top of their priorities though. Especially as they don't appear to have a big sponsor to please.

Renault? Seems a big sponsor!
ForeverF1
Guys, this thread is about Renault in 2010 not about Robert versus whoever. There are other threads to discuss this like this one.
robracer
QUOTE (korzeniow @ Jan 10 2010, 15:54) *
On yours yes, but how do you knew JV isn't on Boullier's list?


http://www.crash.net/f1/news/155909/1/sato...in_f1_2010.html
QUOTE
It is understood that Sato – due to turn 33 later this month – is on a five-strong shortlist that has been compiled by new Renault F1 team principal Eric Boullier, alongside experienced BMW refugee Nick Heidfeld, Romain Grosjean, Jérôme d'Ambrosio and Ho-Pin Tung.


Those are the 5 people on the list and Villeneuve isn't one of those 5 people. My list below have the same names.

QUOTE (robracer @ Jan 9 2010, 09:39) *
This is Boullier's shortlist.
  1. Nick Heidfeld
  2. Takuma Sato
  3. Jerome d'Ambrosio
  4. Ho-Ping Tung
  5. Romain Grosjean

In that order.
TheF1PERSON
If that is the order of the list then I expect Heidfeld to get the drive.
Gareth
I'd be surprised if it was definitely that list, in that order, as I'd expect Heidfeld to be signed by now if it was. I doubt he's going to say no, so if he's number 1 choice why isn't the deal done? I can believe the shortlist, but I'd guess they are weighing up the pros and cons of each option currently rather than already having a set order.
as65p
QUOTE (robracer @ Jan 12 2010, 19:32) *
http://www.crash.net/f1/news/155909/1/sato...in_f1_2010.html


Those are the 5 people on the list and Villeneuve isn't one of those 5 people. My list below have the same names.


Well in todays MSA the say that Heidfeld is out of Renaults shortlist as well as Saubers. They figure Villeneuve or Petrov as candidates at Renault, at Sauber they declare the announcment of PdlR as just a matter of time.
alecc
QUOTE (as65p @ Jan 12 2010, 19:56) *
Well in todays MSA the say that Heidfeld is out of Renaults shortlist as well as Saubers. They figure Villeneuve or Petrov as candidates at Renault, at Sauber they declare the announcment of PdlR as just a matter of time.


f1-action.net says that they decided to pick someone from Sato-Heidfeld pair
Tract1on
Sorry, forgive me for asking, but what is MSA?

QUOTE (as65p @ Jan 12 2010, 18:56) *
Well in todays MSA the say that Heidfeld is out of Renaults shortlist as well as Saubers. They figure Villeneuve or Petrov as candidates at Renault, at Sauber they declare the announcment of PdlR as just a matter of time.

highdownforce
QUOTE (Tract1on @ Jan 12 2010, 17:41) *
Sorry, forgive me for asking, but what is MSA?

MotorSport aktuell.
korzeniow
QUOTE (robracer @ Jan 12 2010, 19:32) *
http://www.crash.net/f1/news/155909/1/sato...in_f1_2010.html

Those are the 5 people on the list and Villeneuve isn't one of those 5 people. My list below have the same names.


QUOTE
It is understood

It's simple social engineering, moreover it comes from crash.net - not the best source to rely on.

Instead of beliving unreliable crash.net I prefer to quote reliable sources, especially when there's Q&A.

Look at this, it's part of interview with Eric Boullier, made the day before yesterday:

QUOTE
CMJ All Renault enthusiasts consider as a French team then this might be the best place to expect to see a Formula One driver of French. So are we can expect a French driver at Renault in 2010, a Romain Grosjean or Franck Montagny?

EB: "There have been discussing with Franck, Romain, indeed some are still ongoing I will not hide. I'm French, Renault is French, so there would be a natural inclination to have a French driver. J 'd like well to have one, but this is not a priority: I focus on the interests of the team, and with no obligation vis-à-vis our partners, or Renault, it will be best strategic choice for the team. If it is French, so much the better ... "

CMJ: It may be French, but French, we think of the Belgian Bertrand Baguette, who won the World Series by Renault 3.5. There are also pilot experience, now on the floor, as Nick Heidfeld for example.

EB: "All the drivers you quote me the names of drivers with whom we discuss every day. It's really a complicated matrix to perform, putting aside the emotional point of view because it is important to find someone a performance as possible, but also in time: the choice of the driver is really crucial. "


It seems to me that at your list at least two names are missing. So again, how could you possibly knew what's on Boullier's list?

So, when you figured sth out, don't make it look like it is beyond any doubt. Okay? Unless you have some inside top secret info smile.gif


edit:
I forgot post source to this interview: here it is
Tract1on
Do you have a link to this article i cant seem to find it on the MSA website: http://www.motorsport-aktuell.com/
Thanks.

QUOTE (as65p @ Jan 12 2010, 18:56) *
Well in todays MSA the say that Heidfeld is out of Renaults shortlist as well as Saubers. They figure Villeneuve or Petrov as candidates at Renault, at Sauber they declare the announcment of PdlR as just a matter of time.

highdownforce
QUOTE (Tract1on @ Jan 12 2010, 17:57) *
Do you have a link to this article i cant seem to find it on the MSA website: http://www.motorsport-aktuell.com/
Thanks.

It's on the printed version only.
Francesc
Villeneuve's return would be sweet, but so too would be Sato's.

I feel sorry for Nick, but if his manager doesn't do his job as he should it's his problem.
ric
QUOTE (highdownforce @ Jan 12 2010, 21:03) *
It's on the printed version only.

In today's Speedweek print version you can read that Nick is on the way to be 3rd driver at Mercedes-Benz.
They don't believe Nick would like to partner Robert again.
In my eyes it's pure speculation - Speedweek often provided wrong "facts" during the last months.
robracer
QUOTE (korzeniow @ Jan 12 2010, 19:44) *
It's simple social engineering, moreover it comes from crash.net - not the best source to rely on.

Instead of beliving unreliable crash.net I prefer to quote reliable sources, especially when there's Q&A.

Look at this, it's part of interview with Eric Boullier, made the day before yesterday:



It seems to me that at your list at least two names are missing. So again, how could you possibly knew what's on Boullier's list?

So, when you figured sth out, don't make it look like it is beyond any doubt. Okay? Unless you have some inside top secret info smile.gif


edit:
I forgot post source to this interview: here it is


There is no proof that crash is unreliable, I find it to be quite useful but that article on crash I posted earlier today I only found today, and I posted the list a few days ago.

Boullier mentioned a five man short list and I knew four of the names on it so I went to find out who the fifth person was. I found that it was Sato and put him in the list in 2nd behind Heidfeld because they are the favourites. My list was right but it is all irrelevent now because it is between the top two in that list, Heidfeld and Sato.

Of course, people will find a way to claim that i'm bullshiting again but I know i'm right. Don't bother replying because I won't respond to any replies. wave.gif
Hurricane
QUOTE (robracer @ Jan 12 2010, 22:17) *
There is no proof that crash is unreliable, I find it to be quite useful but that article on crash I posted earlier today I only found today, and I posted the list a few days ago.

Boullier mentioned a five man short list and I knew four of the names on it so I went to find out who the fifth person was. I found that it was Sato and put him in the list in 2nd behind Heidfeld because they are the favourites. My list was right but it is all irrelevent now because it is between the top two in that list, Heidfeld and Sato.

Of course, people will find a way to claim that i'm bullshiting again but I know i'm right. Don't bother replying because I won't respond to any replies. wave.gif

Those that have been following F1 Racing and F1 News for a fair amount of time do come to recognize the sites that are copying other sites consistently... Crash.net is one of the ones that very rarely has their own original news...
As a test, look around on Monday for F1 News... read a bunch...then print the news page and then look at crash.net on Tuesday. You just might surprise yourself... And don't forget.....no replies..
as65p
QUOTE (robracer @ Jan 12 2010, 22:17) *
Of course, people will find a way to claim that i'm bullshiting again but I know i'm right. Don't bother replying because I won't respond to any replies.


lol.gif

That's the spirit! up.gif clap.gif
YoungGun
QUOTE (taran @ Jan 11 2010, 07:09) *
But isn't that exactly the point? Villeneuve didn't go to Ferrari or stay at Williams or accept any decent offer he got during his BAR days.

He decided to accept a shit load of money and take up the challenge of building his own team. And he failed at that, proving he wasn't worth that much money and wasn't that good as a team leader. Which is why Richards canned him.


Yeah, you're right. Jacques should have accepted the Renault drive offered for considerably more money rather than accepting to remain with BAR. Let's not let facts get in the way.

Anyways and news to report from MSA?
One
IS there any news on 2010 Renualt CAR???
taran
QUOTE (YoungGun @ Jan 13 2010, 11:31) *
Yeah, you're right. Jacques should have accepted the Renault drive offered for considerably more money rather than accepting to remain with BAR. Let's not let facts get in the way.

Anyways and news to report from MSA?


confused.gif confused.gif confused.gif

Don't really understand what your point is.

I am saying that Villeneuve was a good driver but he got seduced by the lure of money (far more than he should realistically have gotten as a single champion) and the opportunity of building his own team like Schumacher did at Ferrari.

The failure of BAR proved he wasn't another Schumacher and thus was not worth that kind of money.

Had he remained at Williams or taken up other offers at established teams, he might have had more success and his reputation wouldn't have sunk to the level it did in 2003/2004 when he could only pick up a Sauber deal.





Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (One @ Jan 13 2010, 21:51) *
IS there any news on 2010 Renualt CAR???

If there was, don't you think it would have been posted by now?
One
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Jan 13 2010, 11:56) *
If there was, don't you think it would have been posted by now?


French guys have often 'local' news, buddy captain. smoking.gif
YoungGun
QUOTE (taran @ Jan 13 2010, 05:55) *
confused.gif confused.gif confused.gif

Don't really understand what your point is.

I am saying that Villeneuve was a good driver but he got seduced by the lure of money (far more than he should realistically have gotten as a single champion) and the opportunity of building his own team like Schumacher did at Ferrari.

The failure of BAR proved he wasn't another Schumacher and thus was not worth that kind of money.

Had he remained at Williams or taken up other offers at established teams, he might have had more success and his reputation wouldn't have sunk to the level it did in 2003/2004 when he could only pick up a Sauber deal.


As I said he was offered more money to join Renault yet remained to stay with BAR. So how you can argue he was seduced by the lure of money is ridiculous. Conversely had he joined Renault, well 2005 would have been another story.
Carlo's
QUOTE (One @ Jan 13 2010, 11:51) *
IS there any news on 2010 Renualt CAR???

I'm afraid, there is no new information about R30 ohwell.gif
One
QUOTE (Carlo's @ Jan 13 2010, 12:13) *
I'm afraid, there is no new information about R30 ohwell.gif


R29 was a dog, even tho I like Renault team, but this was true... Their Aero department need a lot of reshuffling, I do think, After Dino Toso the team went down.
TheF1PERSON
We really need more news from Renault, including second driver, Kubica in a new Renault suit, and launch dates.

A launch of a new website wouldn't be too bad either.
TheF1PERSON
Excuse me, this has just popped up.

Sorry if it has been posted before:

http://paddocktalk.com/news/html/modules.p...c=8&catid=0
alecc
Manager of Takuma Sato denied the rumours that Sato could driver for Renault.
I think everyting else than Nick Heidfeld would be a suprise now.
korzeniow
QUOTE (alecc @ Jan 13 2010, 14:03) *
Manager of Takuma Sato denied the rumours that Sato could driver for Renault.
I think everyting else than Nick Heidfeld would be a suprise now.


hmm Heidfield seems to be the strongest candidate, but if Renault annaunce other driver than QuickNick as their 2nd I wouldn't say it's suprise, especially after reports from Germany indicating that QuickNick may be Mercedes' 3rd driver
MadYarpen
Well, i think if that was nick, they would have him announced already...
TheF1PERSON
There hasn't been a new driver announcement for ages.

We need more confirmations.
potmotr
QUOTE (korzeniow @ Jan 13 2010, 13:35) *
hmm Heidfield seems to be the strongest candidate, but if Renault annaunce other driver than QuickNick as their 2nd I wouldn't say it's suprise, especially after reports from Germany indicating that QuickNick may be Mercedes' 3rd driver


I reckon Mercedes will be Quick Nick's fall back position.

If he can't land Renault he'll go to Mercedes as the spare driver.

Mercedes has no reason to rush their third driver decision as they'll do no testing at all anyway.
korzeniow
QUOTE (TheF1PERSON @ Jan 13 2010, 12:30) *
We really need more news from Renault, including second driver, Kubica in a new Renault suit, and launch dates.

A launch of a new website wouldn't be too bad either.


Unfortunately I there's nothing from above, guess we need to arm ourselfs with patience. In the meantime I found sth about Eric Boullier from Jean-Louis Moncet's blog (better this than nothing smile.gif sad.gif

QUOTE
I do not procrastinate: my first impression is good (remember Talleyrand: beware of the first movement is always good). Boullier me like a normal man, with some human qualities . And most importantly, he has not tried to drown myself in great waxing lyrical about F1. It has a clear, sensible, wise, logical, in a word, with a rational plan and concrete. An observation, assessment, a plan ... and we advance. Moreover, he knows where he puts his feet. Example: I asked him what could scare the threshold of taking office. He replied: "Do not pass the mission entrusted to me, because of ego problems. The people who constitute the middle of the F1 are often oversized ego and is a difficulty of managing people who are affected. Honestly, this is very fair. So for now, I see a man ready to regain lost ground by a team for three years. The rest will be judged on pieces you like me.
TheF1PERSON
According to this article, Fisi could return to Renault:

http://www.tomorrownewsf1.com/f1-fisichell...t-renault-10599
korzeniow
QUOTE (TheF1PERSON @ Jan 13 2010, 15:06) *
According to this article, Fisi could return to Renault:

http://www.tomorrownewsf1.com/f1-fisichell...t-renault-10599


stoned.gif it's total speculation
korzeniow
and by now we all should knew that it's totally wrong, because Fisi isn't on robaracer list smile.gif

(sorry I couldn't resist smile.gif )
juary
QUOTE (korzeniow @ Jan 13 2010, 14:55) *
Unfortunately I there's nothing from above, guess we need to arm ourselfs with patience. In the meantime I found sth about Eric Boullier from Jean-Louis Moncet's blog (better this than nothing smile.gif sad.gif


Why not....one shot for an year with the Domenicali ok to let grow the Gravity (D'ambrosio, Ho pin tung) drivers for 2011....

I'll give some credit to this rumour.
juary
QUOTE (korzeniow @ Jan 13 2010, 15:11) *
stoned.gif it's total speculation


Why not....one shot for an year with the Domenicali ok to let grow the Gravity (D'ambrosio, Ho pin tung) drivers for 2011....

I'll give some credit to this rumour.
eREr
Maybe it's fake (e.g. RB5 in Renault colors), but interesting:

TheF1PERSON
I was hoping for something like this:

Tract1on
Looks like a mid-90's Jordan to me... not really into it.
I thought the 2005/2006 Renault looked great. Blue/yellow.

QUOTE (TheF1PERSON @ Jan 13 2010, 18:46) *
I was hoping for something like this:


FA and RK fan
QUOTE (eREr @ Jan 13 2010, 19:44) *
Maybe it's fake (e.g. RB5 in Renault colors), but interesting:



Fake 100%, just look how high is the nose, alot higher than drivers head, how could one see where he is drving. stoned.gif confused.gif
eREr
QUOTE (FA and RK fan @ Jan 13 2010, 20:08) *
Fake 100%, just look how high is the nose, alot higher than drivers head, how could one see where he is drving. stoned.gif confused.gif

Yeah, it's fake, but look at this:

Tract1on
I thought the higher nose was one of the new rules, reduced driver visability by 60%, help spice the show up.. roflmao.gif

QUOTE (FA and RK fan @ Jan 13 2010, 19:08) *
Fake 100%, just look how high is the nose, alot higher than drivers head, how could one see where he is drving. stoned.gif confused.gif

FA and RK fan
QUOTE (Tract1on @ Jan 13 2010, 20:27) *
I thought the higher nose was one of the new rules, reduced driver visability by 60%, help spice the show up.. roflmao.gif


wave.gif

you are thinking just like FIA, in 2011 they will reduce cost and introduce blindfols. OWG said it is gonna be big step forward.

Seriously, i would really love that classic yellow, black and .
korzeniow
QUOTE (eREr @ Jan 13 2010, 19:44) *
Maybe it's fake (e.g. RB5 in Renault colors), but interesting:



it must be fake, driver won't see anything, where did you get this picture from?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.