Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Renault 2010 (merged)
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196
Disgrace
Biggest upset of the session! Where did Kubica come from?!
metz
QUOTE (Disgrace @ Mar 13 2010, 07:49) *
Where did Kubica come from?!

BMW
thuGG
QUOTE (Disgrace @ Mar 13 2010, 14:49) *
Biggest upset of the session! Where did Kubica come from?!


After Q2 it was quite clear he would make it into Q3. I'm just dissapointed that he made a mistake in Q3, he could have been 7th ambivalent.gif
Gemini
QUOTE (magicon @ Mar 13 2010, 13:15) *
track was slower. it happens


track can get slower in 20 minutes but bot over 0,5 second slower...

ambient temps were same, the cloud can throw shadow and drop track temps but it does not drop times so much

the cars in Q3 were just adjusted in setup to take 160kg of fuel on board, so they got slower

also driver had to remember they will start race on that tyre set so they could run them like in Q3

the FIA/FOM/FOTA again discover the way to ruin Q3 as the fastest q session
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (thuGG @ Mar 14 2010, 00:05) *
After Q2 it was quite clear he would make it into Q3. I'm just dissapointed that he made a mistake in Q3, he could have been 7th ambivalent.gif

He's in ninth, so at least he's on the racing line.
Gemini
QUOTE (thuGG @ Mar 13 2010, 14:05) *
After Q2 it was quite clear he would make it into Q3.


Really? roflmao.gif

I know you meant Q1, just making fun... wave.gif
Muppetmad
QUOTE (thuGG @ Mar 13 2010, 13:05) *
After Q2 it was quite clear he would make it into Q3. I'm just dissapointed that he made a mistake in Q3, he could have been 7th ambivalent.gif


I wouldn't worry too much, I think Robert will move up a few places at the start and then attack towards the end of the race.
Mackey
Good job Renault and Robert, i didnt´expect them in Q3 up.gif up.gif up.gif
Gemini
RK admitted he nearly lost car in T16 and then he pushed hard to recover time. He blocked and flat spotted right front tyre, so he expects problems with vibrations early in the race
CaptainJackSparrow
Well I think the good thing is the car is competitive with the likes of McLaren and Merc atm, it's within striking distance.

Given we weren't expected to be on P1, it's a strong start I think.
Alonzo
Kubica is just sooooooooo good! clap.gif
magicon
QUOTE (Gemini @ Mar 13 2010, 14:27) *
RK admitted he nearly lost car in T16 and then he pushed hard to recover time. He blocked and flat spotted right front tyre, so he expects problems with vibrations early in the race

That is going to suck.
Lord_Shaitan
QUOTE (magicon @ Mar 13 2010, 14:37) *
That is going to suck.

Maybe he can do something on the lap before start. Renault is better heavy as Kubica said, so tomorrow might be a nice afernoon. I'm just afraid of Sutil behind ambivalent.gif . Overall we have to say that Renault has done good job, they're better than expected.
Muppetmad
Look on the bright side everyone - Robert will use up the worse tyres on the first stint and can then use the better tyres for the rest, chasing down those who push their tyres too hard at the end of the race. The Renault is good on heavy fuel and so even with a slight flat spot he can work with it - hey, what's to say pitting early wouldn't be a good idea? It could work! We don't know! We'll have to wait and see what happens tomorrow.
Gemini
QUOTE (Muppetmad @ Mar 13 2010, 14:56) *
hey, what's to say pitting early wouldn't be a good idea? It could work! We don't know! We'll have to wait and see what happens tomorrow.


Pitting early is distaster as you will end up behind all Q2 drivers with slower pace. You will have 1/2 laps window of fresh tyres to pass them and if you fail then you are stucked untill they do their stop.
barteks
QUOTE
FREE PRACTICE 3

Robert Kubica, R30-03, P8, 15 laps, 1:55.331

Vitaly Petrov, R30-02, P18, 16 laps, 1:56.811

QUALIFYING

Robert Kubica, R30-03, P9, 1:55.885

Robert: ”The first target for today was to get into Q3, so we can pleased with that part of the qualifying session, but I am actually a bit disappointed to be only ninth on the grid. I did two good laps in Q1 and Q2, but on my lap in the final part of the session I had a big snap oversteer in the hairpin at turn 16 that cost me about four tenths. On the positive side, we have a clearer picture of where we stand now, and it looks pretty positive when you see the cars around us on the grid: the R30 clearly has good potential. It will be a long, tough race tomorrow but our target has to be to move up the field.”

Vitaly Petrov, R30-02, P17, 1:56.619

Vitaly: “For my first ever qualifying session, this is a normal result, but I really enjoyed today. Our first target was to make Q2 so we achieved this, but we were not very lucky in Q2 and could not continue. Tomorrow is race day and it will be very interesting to see how we do - we will certainly try our best.”

Alan Permane, Chief Race Engineer
“Vitaly had a solid qualifying session for his first Grand Prix weekend. He went comfortably through Q1, which was good. In Q2, he went into turn 9 a little bit too quick on his final timed lap, so he will start P17 tomorrow. As for Robert, he had a solid, untroubled Q1 and Q2 and then went comfortably into Q3, which was what we had hoped for. On his Q3 lap he had a bit of oversteer in turn 16, which cost him quite a bit of time. Overall, we are pleased with the performance of the R30 today and we know that the car works well with high fuel loads and has good straight-line speed. We look forward to a strong race tomorrow.”
Lord_Shaitan
So, they're rather possitive for tomorrow up.gif .

PS. Where have you been barteks wink.gif
TURU
http://translate.google.pl/translate?js=y&...l=en&swap=1

They had some electronic problem with steering wheel and will request FIA to change one tire, because of safety.
barteks
Renault & McLaren have to modify their multilayer diffusers for Australian GP in order to meet FIA requirements:

http://en.espnf1.com/bahrain/motorsport/st...tml?CMP=OTC-RSS


@Lord_Shaitan, it was a busy week for me wink.gif I'm surprised you noticed my absence here.
HMV
FFS, FIA again changes the rules after the season starts. Brilliant.

Not that I didn't expect something like that. After all it's Fia1, not Formula1.
MadYarpen
what a f*cking bastards.
Anyone knows how serious modifications do they need?
Seanspeed
Kubica did much better than I expected. I was figuring the Renault was near the back-end of the midfielders after winter testing. Kubica saying he expected 7th says that they seem to have a solid car.

up.gif to Kubica and the Renault team.
alecc
So, will he manage to overtake one (or both) of the WDC right before him? Will he manage to defend against Sutil on harder tyres?
I'm so excited about the first GP, like a little child on his birthday clap.gif
Carlo's
Hi-Res of diffuser:
http://img159.imagevenue.com/img.php?image..._122_186lo.jpg#
korzeniow
QUOTE (Carlo's @ Mar 13 2010, 21:42) *


Great up.gif Thanks
alecc
A short Q-Times analysis from my side:
Ferrari and Red Bull, that are the strongest ones, without any doubts, and I don't think that anybody considered that Renault could match them in terms of pace. But similar McLaren and Mercedes (besides some smaller notes about struggling Mercedes) nobody would say yesterday and during the winter that Renault could be a threat for them. The most popular opinion was, that there will be the known TOP 4, and Renault, Williams and Sauber would fight for the BOTR (best of the rest) title.
So lets look how is Renault looking in the BOTR clasification (so with Williams and Sauber) in terms of pace in low fuel qualy runs (I took the Q2 times, becaue the Q3 times were slower, and Kubice had an incident on 16th corner):

11 Robert Kubica Renault 1:54.963
9 Rubens Barrichello Williams-Cosworth 1:55.330
10 Nico Hulkenberg Williams-Cosworth 1:55.857
12 Vitaly Petrov Renault 1:56.167 (Q1 time)
22 Pedro de la Rosa BMW Sauber-Ferrari 1:56.237
23 Kamui Kobayashi BMW Sauber-Ferrari 1:56.270
12 Vitaly Petrov Renault 1:56.619

Taking into account, that Vitaly made an mistake, and his pace is like in Q1 about 1:56.167, then its looking like Renault has for now the pest pace on low fuel. And that's positive smile.gif

And now lets look at the Q2 times in the McLaren/Mercedes/Renault group:

Nico Rosberg Mercedes Benz GP Ltd 1:54.682
Lewis Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes 1:54.707
Robert Kubica Renault 1:54.963
Michael Schumacher Mercedes Benz GP Ltd 1:55.105
Jenson Button McLaren-Mercedes 1:55.168
Vitaly Petrov Renault 1:56.167 (Q1 time)

Vitaly a total rookie, the pay driver in a possible little slower car than Kubica (no "snorkel" smile.gif) is only 1s slower than the actual WDC, Kubica is faster than two WDC's in McL/MB and slower than the other ones in McL/MB, for me it looks like that the pace of Renault, McLaren and Mercedes is pretty similar in low fuel qualy runs for now.

And now the optimistic part:
Looking at the armchair specialist technical indications, it's looking like Renault have better pace in heavy cars, because they should be simply lighter on the start.
Looking at the statements, Robert said, that the new parts bring mainly improvements on high fuel pace, and not so on low fuel.
It looks like, that Renault should be have the better "high fuel" pace than McLaren and Mercedes, and if that's not a very big suprise then what is it?
I'am expecting a very positive start from Kubica, and hope that his tyre issue won't be crucial.
But once again, tomorrow will prove, if my teories are right, or only BS smile.gif
Chomsky
Let's look at the negatives from today:

-their diffuser got banned
-petrov is basically a piquet at this point
-they are over one second behind red bull and ferrari
-they are about .3 seconds behind mclaren and mercedes
-it's clear they lack downforce, particularly in the front

for this race
-flat spotted tire for kub
-broken differential button on steering wheel for kub
-the above or a mistake caused kub at least 2 spots in qual
-petrov's qual already tells me that he is not of the caliber of hamilton/kubica/rosberg/vettel

positives:

race hasn't happened yet so who knows about race pace
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (Chomsky @ Mar 14 2010, 13:05) *
-petrov is basically a piquet at this point

What's the supposed to mean? Piquet was someone who wasn't just useless behind the wheel, he always shifted blame for his mistakes. Petrov made a mistake in turn nine that cost him half a second - he went in too quick - and if he hadn't, he would have been much higher up the order than 17th, and this is his first race. In Piquet's first race, he was eliminated in Q1 and started second-last. Give Petrov some time. After all, he did improve his best lap by over two seconds between FP1 and FP2.
alecc
QUOTE (Chomsky @ Mar 14 2010, 03:05) *
Let's look at the negatives from today:

-their diffuser got banned
-petrov is basically a piquet at this point
-they are over one second behind red bull and ferrari
-they are about .3 seconds behind mclaren and mercedes
-it's clear they lack downforce, particularly in the front

for this race
-flat spotted tire for kub
-broken differential button on steering wheel for kub
-the above or a mistake caused kub at least 2 spots in qual
-petrov's qual already tells me that he is not of the caliber of hamilton/kubica/rosberg/vettel

positives:

race hasn't happened yet so who knows about race pace


Good reply to my over-optimistic post up.gif
smile.gif
lg2000
A pessimist is a well-informed optimist. smile.gif
Muppetmad
I am hopeful for today... Robert has overcome worse to get good results (Spa 2009, Interlagos 2009)
korzeniow
QUOTE (alecc @ Mar 14 2010, 02:15) *
Vitaly a total rookie, the pay driver in a possible little slower car than Kubica (no "snorkel" smile.gif) is only 1s slower than the actual WDC, Kubica is faster than two WDC's in McL/MB and slower than the other ones in McL/MB, for me it looks like that the pace of Renault, McLaren and Mercedes is pretty similar in low fuel qualy runs for now.


Come on... you are making a mountain out of a mole-hill... There is no evidence that Petrov has slower car than Kubica. And there is no evidence that this inlet isn't for cooling.
korzeniow
New tyre for Robert: http://f1.pl/Artykul.82+M51c2a035131.0.html

FIA approved thier request.

QUOTE
"Stewards were very kind for us and allowed change of flatted tyre," said representative of Renault.
MadYarpen
Hopefully they will change steering wheel too:) is it possible?
kwanchepan
QUOTE (korzeniow @ Mar 14 2010, 16:47) *
New tyre for Robert: http://f1.pl/Artykul.82+M51c2a035131.0.html

FIA approved thier request.

That's a good news for Renault.
Muppetmad
QUOTE (korzeniow @ Mar 14 2010, 08:47) *
New tyre for Robert: http://f1.pl/Artykul.82+M51c2a035131.0.html

FIA approved thier request.


Good to hear. Robert can make the most of Renault's seemingly excellent heavy fuel pace smile.gif
RF1 fan
Soft Tyre should make 18-20 laps:
http://www.autohebdo.fr/f1/f1/article-25-2...eure-strategie-
korzeniow
QUOTE (RF1 fan @ Mar 14 2010, 10:27) *


It's hard to imagine for me, but maby they are right. Just look at this: http://twitpic.com/18a2yz
Metal
R30 is a very very good car, for now there isnt a TOP4, there is a TOP2: RB and Ferrari, almost always the cars so much in the front in quali(by almost a sec) were also in front in the race, so Mclaren and Mercedes are waaay behind, who is front at the beginning will win the Championship, even if you catch em later on, the difference in points will be too big(like Alonso in 2005, Button last year), so its gonna be between RB and Ferrari this year.

Then there is the fight for the 3rd spot, we're in, together with Mclaren, Mercedes and prolly force India. In Q2 where almost every1 went the fastest we were 2-3 tenths off Rosberg and Hamilton, the best of Mercedes and Mclaren.We could have done better as i monitored Roberts laps, he did a 1.54.9 on the first lap of a 3 laps stint, then he went slower, maybe to preserve tyres, having 2 more laps in the tank he could have done a 1.54.7 same result as Rosberg and Mercedes! And quali is our biggest weakness!! We are in GOOD shape.

I think we can fight for the 3rd as a Constructor and 5th spot in quali and in the race, if notting happens with the the Big2. And we all know what Robert did with the 3rd best car in 2008 ;)
korzeniow
@Metal, everything can happen. Don't write off whole season, because there wasn't any race yet.

This year will be much much diffrent than last year. As you said this year are two main competitors at the moment - even if they will be in front, they will split points bettwen them - so this year we won't have domination a la Brawn. Also no team will drop development like it was in 2009. Tittle isn't settled yet.

Bahrain track is very long so diffrences between teams can be bigger. My recipe is: just wait.



Ok, it's less than half an hour. My bet is Kubica will end 6th/7th.
MadYarpen
QUOTE (korzeniow @ Mar 14 2010, 11:37) *
Ok, it's less than half an hour. My bet is Kubica will end 6th/7th.


huh confused.gif

1h 21min at the moment.
korzeniow
QUOTE (MadYarpen @ Mar 14 2010, 11:39) *
huh confused.gif

1h 21min at the moment.


yeah yeah my bad, just realized while watching Little Manhattan lol.gif
Lord_Shaitan
Diffusers rumors in case of Renault might be BS. Nothing is questioned by FIA as of now. So good news!

http://twitter.com/rf1paddockpass/status/10464582540

Check reply to rentonB:

http://twitter.com/rf1paddockpass
MadYarpen
QUOTE (Lord_Shaitan @ Mar 14 2010, 11:52) *
Diffusers rumors in case of Renault might be BS. Nothing is questioned by FIA as of now. So good news!

http://twitter.com/rf1paddockpass/status/10464582540


error is all I see there
Szoelloe
QUOTE (korzeniow @ Mar 14 2010, 11:37) *
Ok, it's less than half an hour. My bet is Kubica will end 6th/7th.


there are at least 8 cars with better race pace on the grid. If he is lucky, and there are many dnf's, maybe. But unlikely.
korzeniow
QUOTE (MadYarpen @ Mar 14 2010, 11:57) *
error is all I see there


yeah, me too, but:

@rf1paddockpass What about the diffusers can you share something about this with us?

@rentonB Nothing to report at our end on this David. The FIA hasn't contacted us on the matter.
korzeniow
QUOTE (Szoelloe @ Mar 14 2010, 12:07) *
there are at least 8 cars with better race pace on the grid. If he is lucky, and there are many dnf's, maybe. But unlikely.


6th if we are lucky.

7th is realistic: Kubica in front of Schumacher and Button
Metal
QUOTE (Szoelloe @ Mar 14 2010, 12:07) *
there are at least 8 cars with better race pace on the grid. If he is lucky, and there are many dnf's, maybe. But unlikely.


Mercedes and Mclaren have a better pace??? What makes u say that? Have you read my last post?
Gemini
QUOTE (Lord_Shaitan @ Mar 14 2010, 11:52) *
Diffusers rumors in case of Renault might be BS. Nothing is questioned by FIA as of now. So good news!

http://twitter.com/rf1paddockpass/status/10464582540

Check reply to rentonB:

http://twitter.com/rf1paddockpass


if you compare Mercedes' solution in here

http://scarbsf1.wordpress.com/2010/03/14/b...-clarification/

and Renault's in exclellent picture posted in post # 3474 you can see Merc solution is way more extreme. Actually it's completely different than Renault. I don't think any big change would be needed for Renault.
bankoq
Renault fuel consumption advantage has been minimized by other engine suppliers. Info from most reliable polish F1 journalist.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.