Autosport article, although half of it is meaningless twaddle about Singapore, confirms many of the things that have already been said:
QUOTE
Talking to a Ferrari man in Singapore, there is no doubting the 2007 world champion's speed or talent. It's just that Raikkonen didn't pick up and lead a team, galvanise it, in the way that Alonso does.
I've heard this school of thought many times, and personally I worry about a team with 300 - 400 people putting two cars on the grid having to be lead by a driver. Alonso can't miraculously add downforce on to the car by magic and Michael Schumacher's late nights at Maranello counted for absolutely nothing until Rory Byrne got on top of the regulations and the aerodynamics from 2000 onwards. It's a mirage.
All a driver can do is tell you what he likes and what he wants doing with the car and for the engineers to go away and do it and make it faster for the driver to then go out and drive the wheels off it. Kubica did that at Renault. You need a car to work with and you need people doing what you say though.
QUOTE
A Ferrari team used to dealing with Michael Schumacher for so long was amazed by both Raikkonen's pace and his immediate grasp of Ferrari technical systems in 2007. It seemed there was spare mental capacity by the bucket load.
Check. We know that.
QUOTE
But, they say, the real Kimi is not the Kimi of popular perception. The so-called Ice Man, unfazed by anything, impervious to outside influences and very much his own man, is an illusion. Thinking back, they say, Raikkonen did not feel comfortable when he thought Felipe Massa was becoming Ferrari's favoured son in 2008. While he doesn't need mollycoddling, he does need to feel that a team is behind him.
I can certainly buy Raikkonen's personal persona not being quite what he's really like underneath. Of course Raikkonen didn't feel comfortable when he felt Massa was being favoured, as we all know he was now, and we all saw how Alonso felt about that situation the season before at McLaren. The difference with Raikkonen is he kept his trap shut and got his head down and people filled the vacuum with stories. Ferrari just didn't listen to Raikkonen and his performances suffered, although he was still good enough for them to win the constructor's title.
Every driver needs to feel supported and feel that the team is listening to what you say - Alonso as much as anyone else.
QUOTE
By way of example they say, Kimi, disappointing early in '09, was a different driver after Massa's unfortunate accident in Hungary involving the rogue spring. The focus of the team again, Raikkonen was awesome in the second half of the year with a car that was not one of Maranello's best, taking podiums while Luca Badoer and then Giancarlo Fisichella were struggling to get the other car out of Q1.
We all know this as well. I'm also puzzled by it as well, because we've been told that Raikkonen wasn't a team leader like Alonso and yet once the focus was on him he took on that role perfectly and was 'awesome' in a pretty terrible car? You can't have it all ways I'm afraid.