Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Sauber 2010 (merged)
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
Rob
QUOTE (Victor_RO @ Jan 19 2010, 14:59) *
Let's hope that the Sauber is reliable enough so that Pedro won't be misled by another marshal to jump over the barrier and into a river like at Indy in 2002. lol.gif


That was funny. I'd forgotten about that.
shonguiz
I don't like this decision, hope time will prove me wrong.
jeze
QUOTE (WebBerK @ Jan 19 2010, 13:45) *
Shame on you, Fisi. redface.gif

You lost the seat to a guy that never won a race and doesn't know the Ferrari engine.

You should have stayed at FI. evil.gif


Nah, McLaren's paying. They want notes on how the Ferrari engine works, and they rely on de la Rosa to trace the engine's strong and weak patches wave.gif
otoelpiloto
inmense pedro!!! you really deserved it man, now it's time to blow all these unbelievers away...pedro rules!!! clap.gif clap.gif
Hole
Hehe, so doubling people get explaining the reasons Pedro got signed when the driver they wanted wasn't chosen...


Money talks... 5 millions in F1 XD
robracer
I think the reason Sauber didn't choose Fisco is because Ferrari would have requested that they be something like their B team, and Sauber didn't want that so he chose Pedro instead.
Hole
QUOTE (Clatter @ Jan 19 2010, 15:10) *
It's because if he had shown any real speed as a race driver he would have been snapped up and not spent the best part of his career as a test driver. Racing wise Heidfeld or Fisi are much better bets. All very well saying Sauber wants him for his development skills, but if funding is as short as is being said, then there won't be much development going on anyway.


He wasn't considered because unlike Massa, Alonso, Kimi, Schumacher, Hamilton and others, he didn't have a strong figure from F1 pushing for him nor sponsors.

And precisely because of limit testing signging a guy who has tested a lot makes a lot of sense.



I really hope that if Pedro prove some people wrong they are brave to admit they were wrong.-
BrokenBaculum
QUOTE (potmotr @ Jan 19 2010, 12:51) *
So these are the names we'll be seeing on the Sauber.

Panasonic, via Kobayashi

Universia, an arm of Santander, via de le Rosa http://www.universia.net/#noticias


I thought Kobayashi wasn't bringing any dosh with him, let alone Panasonic? Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see the logo on the car (which looks great on racing cars IMO), but I thought those rumours were quashed. Let's hope otherwise!
the9th
Pedro is a fast driver. Period. With a good lean team around him he's as good as anyone. He's probably as good as Button - that's what's really funny. C'mon Pedro! Go Sauber! smoking.gif
robracer
QUOTE (the9th @ Jan 19 2010, 16:07) *
Pedro is a fast driver. Period. With a good lean team around him he's as good as anyone. He's probably as good as Button - that's what's really funny. C'mon Pedro! Go Sauber! smoking.gif


roflmao.gif Nice joke.
the9th
QUOTE (robracer @ Jan 19 2010, 16:08) *
roflmao.gif Nice joke.

I'm only half joking, I really believe he's fast. Chez Mclaren that's a known fact.
I'll be cheering for both Koba and Pedro.
Rob
QUOTE (the9th @ Jan 19 2010, 16:12) *
I'm only half joking, I really believe he's fast. Chez Mclaren that's a known fact.


If he was that fast they would have dumped Kovalainen and given him the seat.
the9th
QUOTE (Rob @ Jan 19 2010, 16:13) *
If he was that fast they would have dumped Kovalainen and given him the seat.

I don't believe it works that way. F1 is hardly that straightforward. Lot's of interested parties, accommodation. They might have been disappointed with Kovalainen, but the team revolves around Lewis anyway. Button is in a unique situation to change that.
Archangel
Good News !!

A great pair by Sauber, a good job Peter Sauber.

I wanna see Pedro at his best again.
William Hunt
QUOTE (robracer @ Jan 19 2010, 18:08) *
roflmao.gif Nice joke.


Check my post on de la Rosa in theis thread; I've posted all his qualifying performances and those of his teammates to show people that he was (and hopefully still is) a very fast driver, he trashed Verstappen in qualy at Arrows and he matched Irvine's pace.
Gemini
QUOTE (Rinehart @ Jan 19 2010, 14:26) *
Still BMW. Usual change your name lose your prize money entitlement silliness presumably.

Can't believe BMW are thrilled with a Ferrari engined midfield team baring their name - their choice to go/sell I suppose.

Surely this will be rebadged by someone, come Bahrain?


Sauber won't loose any TV money as they... don't have one. They did not sign Concorde Agreement mid last year so they are not entitled to it.

The delay with name change is that change now requires agreement of all Teams. So they probably do this only when they will have confirmed title sponsor to use in new name.

The icing on the cake for Sauber is to imagine faces of BMW Board in Munich when they will keep reading every second Monday about BMW named car being lapped twice by Mercedes haha
TheF1PERSON
Plus, the driver profiles for the Sauber drivers haven't been listed on the official site yet because they are yet to turn up on an entry list. But they won't need the numbers until March anyway.

I expect the FIA to release an updated entry list when all the drivers are announced that confirms Saubers numbers (likely to be 26 and 27)
Hole
OMG, if now Pedro goes to Sauber... Now I'm thinking it is not such a nice idea... Mainly because Pedro was the only commentator in the Spanish TV that was worth of being heard... Now who will hold Lobato's idiocies? :S
carbonfibre
QUOTE (William Hunt @ Jan 19 2010, 17:42) *
Check my post on de la Rosa in theis thread; I've posted all his qualifying performances and those of his teammates to show people that he was (and hopefully still is) a very fast driver, he trashed Verstappen in qualy at Arrows and he matched Irvine's pace.
Qualifying is nice but it's about getting points in the race. Verstappen got 5 points that year Pedro got 2. Irvine also got a lot more points against Pedro.
Craven Morehead
A surprising choice by Peter Sauber. It's turning out to be the year of the old guys. Schumi returns at 41, PDLR returns @ 38. All we need now is Villeneuve in the Renault for the hat trick. biggrin.gif

Good luck to PDLR this season.
Showty
QUOTE (AdamKOR @ Jan 19 2010, 19:07) *
OMG, if now Pedro goes to Sauber... Now I'm thinking it is not such a nice idea... Mainly because Pedro was the only commentator in the Spanish TV that was worth of being heard... Now who will hold Lobato's idiocies? :S



That´s a cause of concern in Spain, trust me lol.gif

Anyway, i´m willing to pay the price, Pedro deserved a driver seat for a while, he finally got it, i´m very happy for him.


They might turn to Joan Villadelprat, i don´t know, maybe a F1 specialist journalist like Manel Serra, i guess Marc Gené is a very difficult target.
showtime
QUOTE (Showty @ Jan 19 2010, 19:29) *
That´s a cause of concern in Spain, trust me lol.gif

Anyway, i´m willing to pay the price, Pedro deserved a driver seat for a while, he finally got it, i´m very happy for him.


They might turn to Joan Villadelprat, i don´t know, maybe a F1 specialist journalist like Manel Serra, i guess Marc Gené is a very difficult target.


I think Gene did Pedro's job for T5 in 2006 when he replaced Montoya. Seems the perfect choice, even more now with Alonso in Ferrari.
FFYM
Fisi was the paid driver this time. No way to sign a ferrari driver "just" for save near than 2 millions of the 6 millions engines deal and of course... the salary of Giancarlo.
Stephan
Peter Sauber made a big mistake, let's see what his options were:

Heidfeld; quick, reliable, experienced
Fisichella: quick but randomly, experienced, $$
Petrov: $$$$$
de la Rosa: Slow $?

confused.gif confused.gif
FFYM
QUOTE (Stephan @ Jan 19 2010, 20:11) *
Peter Sauber made a big mistake, let's see what his options were:

Heidfeld; quick, reliable, experienced
Fisichella: quick but randomly, experienced, $$
Petrov: $$$$$
de la Rosa: Slow $?

confused.gif confused.gif


Heidfield quick? just ask to Robert.
Robert72
QUOTE (Stephan @ Jan 19 2010, 20:11) *
de la Rosa: Slow $?

confused.gif confused.gif

roflmao.gif roflmao.gif roflmao.gif

MadYarpen


QUOTE (FFYM @ Jan 19 2010, 20:12) *
Heidfield quick? just ask to Robert.

Well, not slow for sure? wave.gif

QUOTE (Stephan @ Jan 19 2010, 20:11) *
Peter Sauber made a big mistake, let's see what his options were:

Heidfeld; quick, reliable, experienced
Fisichella: quick but randomly, experienced, $$
Petrov: $$$$$
de la Rosa: Slow $?

confused.gif confused.gif


looks like petrov grabbed by renault, but who knows. For sure not good option for kamui's partner.
Hole
QUOTE (Stephan @ Jan 19 2010, 20:11) *
Peter Sauber made a big mistake, let's see what his options were:

Heidfeld; quick, reliable, experienced
Fisichella: quick but randomly, experienced, $$
Petrov: $$$$$
de la Rosa: Slow $?

confused.gif confused.gif


No bias eh? lol.gif

QUOTE (showtime @ Jan 19 2010, 19:38) *
I think Gene did Pedro's job for T5 in 2006 when he replaced Montoya. Seems the perfect choice, even more now with Alonso in Ferrari.


l really hope they pick Gene. Test drivers don't have much stuff to do these days and his views would be pretty much welcome.

QUOTE (carbonfibre @ Jan 19 2010, 19:13) *
Qualifying is nice but it's about getting points in the race. Verstappen got 5 points that year Pedro got 2. Irvine also got a lot more points against Pedro.


8 points are "a lot of points"? And specially taking into account both suffered from an insane number of engine failures and that the time Irvine got more points was when there were 18 retirements?
Mauseri
QUOTE (AdamKOR @ Jan 19 2010, 22:19) *
8 points are "a lot of points"? And specially taking into account both suffered from an insane number of engine failures and that the time Irvine got more points was when there were 18 retirements?

If I remember correctly, Irvine was faster more often than not. Something like a bit over 2 tenths on average. Verstappen versus de la Rosa was an even fight. Points are not always the whole truth, as you say. De la Rosa performed likevise against Kimi at McLaren as Fisi at Ferrari, but at least he was familiar with the car. I'm not excepting much at this age anymore from him. Journeyman, he is there mostly for his experience and the $$. Koba is their star, although I'm not sure if he really is a star.
Stephan
QUOTE (AdamKOR @ Jan 19 2010, 20:19) *
No bias eh? lol.gif



l really hope they pick Gene. Test drivers don't have much stuff to do these days and his views would be pretty much welcome.



8 points are "a lot of points"? And specially taking into account both suffered from an insane number of engine failures and that the time Irvine got more points was when there were 18 retirements?


I am very sorry, but if you think that Heidfeld or Fisichella would not have beaten de la Rosa (just like Irvine and Verstappen did), then you are kidding yourself.
GiancarloF1
Those who defend de la Rosa... are you guys for real? This is a joke at best, Sauber lost his mind. down.gif
the9th
QUOTE (Stephan @ Jan 19 2010, 19:48) *
I am very sorry, but if you think that Heidfeld or Fisichella would not have beaten de la Rosa (just like Irvine and Verstappen did), then you are kidding yourself.

Like he would never beat Wurz, right? Or Paffett...wink.gif
Fisichella was beaten by Kovalainen which I now think it's a disgrace. Fisi did beat Jenson which might be an indication that Jenson will suck, paired against Lewis... I wouldn't take anything for granted in F1. Things can and will change. Perception can be deceptive.
Bear in mind that when Pedro was at Jaguar, in his second year, he was the guy on the grid who usually started with an heavier fuel load. Maybe the new rules will suit him.
noikeee
I don't understand why people are so surprised today that it isn't Heidfeld, when Peter Sauber had already flat out said he wasn't going to sign Heidfeld a couple days ago. I suppose you guys missed that? It was on an interview to some swiss newspaper and it was all over several threads, including this one.

Now WHY Heidfeld wasn't considered is still a bit of a mystery. I thought that might be because of Nick already having a deal with Renault, but if that was the case we would've heard more about it by now.
Francesc
QUOTE (GiancarloF1 @ Jan 19 2010, 21:09) *
Those who defend de la Rosa... are you guys for real? This is a joke at best, Sauber lost his mind. down.gif



Your nick name says it basically wink.gif
Korben82
QUOTE (GiancarloF1 @ Jan 19 2010, 22:09) *
Those who defend de la Rosa... are you guys for real? This is a joke at best, Sauber lost his mind. down.gif


No bias here lol.gif

Btw, I don't think making BADoer look average by comparison last year did Giancarlo any favours in his seek of a drive this year.
Mauseri
QUOTE (paranoik0 @ Jan 19 2010, 23:34) *
Now WHY Heidfeld wasn't considered is still a bit of a mystery. I thought that might be because of Nick already having a deal with Renault, but if that was the case we would've heard more about it by now.

Maybe the team just prefers to go forward and try something new, rather than sticking to the past? Also $$ must count.
MadYarpen
I think heidfeld said NO hoping for Merc seat, and after schumi came up it was to late.
prty
http://www.lasextadeportes.com/videos/ver/..._emitido/224383

From 4:00 mins PDLR interview (Spanish).
Xaus
QUOTE (GiancarloF1 @ Jan 19 2010, 15:09) *
Those who defend de la Rosa... are you guys for real? This is a joke at best, Sauber lost his mind. down.gif

lawls... yes, I'm for real. Because 1) i'm not biased 2) i'm not insane 3) i trust a man who's ran a successful sports car team, relatively stable and successful F1 team, and is a savvy businessman over some guy on an F1 forum to make the right decisions that will bring a positive outcome to his team. Sauber could have easily walked away when he sold the team to BMW and not bothered with repurchasing it. He cares. He's not about to hire a person that would compromise his team's future.

Then again I'm guessing you're just a Fisi fanboy so I'll stop there since there's no getting through fanboys.
balaclava
Its amazing the venomous hate being spit towards Pedro here... They have the face to call him a PAY DRIVER. wow.

He is in F1 ON MERIT. Repeat after me.... ON MTF MERIT! You've got to at least respect that!

Heidfeld is better than Pedro in...what exactly? kUbica made him look like a fool last year. I bet Sauber loved that.

Fisichella just lost his touch after the beatdown that Mr Alonso put on him. Hes a good driver.. and so is PDLR.

People here make a driver that has won IT ALL before F1 look like hes a dud behind the wheel. PATHETIC.

Pay driver... what a joke.

GiancarloF1
Cheering for de la Rosa doesn't make sense. The guy made Verstappen look good (the guy, who have been blown away by Schumacher in 94), Irvine beaten him soundly too. His return to the McLaren was a failure.

One fake podium, and a couple of minor points here and there, and that's all. He couldn't hold a candle to neither Fisi nor Heidfeld. His results are just hacks compared to the other two, let alone WDC drivers.
barteks
MadYarpen
they look like two grandpas here:]
prty
QUOTE (GiancarloF1 @ Jan 19 2010, 22:56) *
Cheering for de la Rosa doesn't make sense. The guy made Verstappen look good (the guy, who have been blown away by Schumacher in 94), Irvine beaten him soundly too. His return to the McLaren was a failure.

One fake podium, and a couple of minor points here and there, and that's all. He couldn't hold a candle to neither Fisi nor Heidfeld. His results are just hacks compared to the other two, let alone WDC drivers.


I smell bitterness. Maybe your nick and the fact that Fisichella was being considered is a hint. Hmmm
potmotr
QUOTE (paranoik0 @ Jan 19 2010, 20:34) *
I don't understand why people are so surprised today that it isn't Heidfeld, when Peter Sauber had already flat out said he wasn't going to sign Heidfeld a couple days ago. I suppose you guys missed that? It was on an interview to some swiss newspaper and it was all over several threads, including this one.

Now WHY Heidfeld wasn't considered is still a bit of a mystery. I thought that might be because of Nick already having a deal with Renault, but if that was the case we would've heard more about it by now.


Yep, agree with your points.

No surprise that Nick wasn't one of the drivers.

Mystery why he's been excluded.
potmotr
QUOTE (barteks @ Jan 19 2010, 21:56) *


I've met De La Rosa as a fan, and he was quite the gentleman.

Fair play to him, he's got the gig.

Lets hope he does well.

Clatter
QUOTE (AdamKOR @ Jan 19 2010, 15:32) *
He wasn't considered because unlike Massa, Alonso, Kimi, Schumacher, Hamilton and others, he didn't have a strong figure from F1 pushing for him nor sponsors.

And precisely because of limit testing signging a guy who has tested a lot makes a lot of sense.



I really hope that if Pedro prove some people wrong they are brave to admit they were wrong.-


If he proves to be quick I'll happily admit I was wrong, but don't forget he hasn't tested for the best part (maybe longer) of a year.
Victor
QUOTE (TheF1PERSON @ Jan 19 2010, 11:07) *
I don't know how much longer Santander will sponsor McLaren now that De La Rosa has left.

Unless they intend to use Hamilton as the British representive.

But at least we have another driver announcement, and one of the oddest.


I believe Santander is sponsoring McLaren to reach the UK public, not the Spanish. They do not need a Spanish driver in McLaren
MadYarpen
McLaren itself is worth of sponsoring, and in fact not much has changed - pedro was test driver only
Empy
1000!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.