QUOTE (potmotr @ Dec 10 2009, 23:10)

They all bring different things.
Schumacher: Pro: Brings massive exposure, incredibly heritage and huge technical ability. Con: Expensive, and has he still got it?
Kubica: Pro: Most probably quicker than Rosberg. A winner. Huge natural speed. Con: Mercedes will have to wait until late to discover if they get him.
Heidfeld: Pro: Incredibly reliable points scorer. Stays out of trouble. Excellent development driver. German. Con: About the same level as Rosberg perhaps at a time when the team needs a proper number one?
Di Resta: Pro: Potential. Beat Vettel in F3. Con: Zero F1 experience. Have tin-tops blunted his edge?
Fry already said they want an experienced driver and a rookie is highly unlikely, so I think we can rule out Di Resta.
I'm still not sure if Kubica is worth his hype, I have yet to see anything exceptional from him, to be honest. So to me at least he is still a question mark and I would put that among his "cons".
Schumi is definetly proven, but yeah, that was 3 years ago and before. Has he still got it? That's the 1 million dollar question.
I have the impression that Heidfeld is the last option for Mercedes (poor Nick). He is good, but not great. German, but uninspiring. There was an interview I have read recently with Hans Hermann, who was a Merc factory F1 driver in the 50s-60s and when they asked him about Heidfeld he was like: "Heidfeld? No please!" Granted, it's just his opinion - even if he is good friends with Norbert Haug -, but kind of telling about Heidfeld's reputation even in his own country. I find it sad because I rate him, but of course if the choice is between Schumi and him, there's no question which one Merc would take first, even if it's a risky choice because of MS's age etc. But at least he would give the exposure, hype etc.