Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Mercedes GP - the 2010 Silver Arrows (Merged)
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123
Timstr11
QUOTE (domhnall @ Nov 16 2009, 17:11) *
Is that really the official artist's impression of the livery??? They could have picked a better angle

Yes. Supplied by Mercedes.
Timstr11
Video Norbert Haug on the deal:
http://f1.gpupdate.net/en/videos/norbert-h...grand-prix_236/

At the end he says that this about the driver negotiations/appointments: "We will do a very good job in that respect, I can promise you. Maybe we can create some surprises...."
Chezrome

I wrote it another thread too, but again: I think this take-over was especially the reason Brawn was dragging its feet with resigning Button. Brawn knew Mercedes wanted a say in the drivers-line up. So why tie your hands with paying an amount you don't want to spend?

One
Having two WDC on two teams are great assets for Merc. So I assume Brawn to retain Button for 2010.
bonneville
QUOTE (One @ Nov 16 2009, 17:05) *
Having two WDC on two teams are great assets for Merc. So I assume Brawn to retain Button for 2010.


How about 3 WDC between factory and McLaren for the Mercedes super team?
FenderJaguar
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Nov 16 2009, 14:28) *
It's just a photoshop of a BGP-001.


Just wondering. Do you really think someone didn't understand that???
King Six
Liveries always just depend on Sponsors really. You get the exceptions, Ferrari red or.. Force India, India flag. I don't think the Silver McLaren had anything to do with Mercedes as they were with Merc for awhile but didn't go silver until relatively recently (2007 I think)

Mercedes livery will probably also be fairly dominated by some form of Sponsor. Although Grey will most likely be the base colour. If there's one thing you can guarantee is that they probably won't have much or any red on that car, they'll want to not look like a McLaren and Vice Versa.

Perhaps the McLaren will have just that bit less grey and more red next season. Who knows, Liveries are one of those things that you don't really find out until some time after.

When does the Vodaphone sponsorship expire?
One
QUOTE (bonneville @ Nov 16 2009, 18:08) *
How about 3 WDC between factory and McLaren for the Mercedes super team?



Kimi you mean? Less likely, as Nick looks like getting one silver arrow on his neck.
Kompressor
I've been following BAR Honda since there inception and several name changes. Now they have gone from Honda to Brawn to Mercedes Grand Prix in the course of a year.

I look forward to cheering on Mercedes Grand Prix. Now we just need some drivers.
f1rules
First cant we give this thread a shorter name like Mercedes Gp or something.
Well im really looking forward to seeing real silver arrows again. I hope they can fight with ferrari and Mclaren although i have my doubts. But i sure hope.
werks prototype
Haug said it himself 'surprises' regarding their driver line up. I can easily imagine Vettels contract now being bought out and Jenson sent with his number 1 to Red Bull. Just to give Vettel a chance at youngest ever driver champion. Negotiation with Vettels 'manager' should be pretty easy right. 'wink'
Mia 01
I am not so concerned about my teams looks, I´m moore concerned about there performance.
Bishy
I'm just upset that McLaren have lost the "Silver Arrows" tag, there was always something sexy when that was linked to the McLaren cars ambivalent.gif
bonneville
QUOTE (f1rules @ Nov 16 2009, 18:49) *
First cant we give this thread a shorter name like Mercedes Gp or something.


+1

Mercedes-Benz W 2010 (Merged) would do it.
scheivlak
QUOTE (Timstr11 @ Nov 16 2009, 17:30) *
At the end he says that this about the driver negotiations/appointments: "We will do a very good job in that respect, I can promise you. Maybe we can create some surprises...."

Didn't read all the posts yet, but has nobody as yet suggested Michael Schumacher biggrin.gif
bonneville
QUOTE (scheivlak @ Nov 16 2009, 20:44) *
Didn't read all the posts yet, but has nobody as yet suggested Michael Schumacher biggrin.gif


Hahaha. Didn't think about that one.
P123
QUOTE (werks prototype @ Nov 16 2009, 19:09) *
Haug said it himself 'surprises' regarding their driver line up. I can easily imagine Vettels contract now being bought out and Jenson sent with his number 1 to Red Bull. Just to give Vettel a chance at youngest ever driver champion. Negotiation with Vettels 'manager' should be pretty easy right. 'wink'


Button to Red Bull, Vettel to Mercedes and Kimi to McLaren?

My only concern is that Kimi may be left out in the cold, albeit with a nice paycheck from Ferrari to cushion the rejection.
FlatOverCrest
QUOTE (scheivlak @ Nov 16 2009, 13:44) *
Didn't read all the posts yet, but has nobody as yet suggested Michael Schumacher biggrin.gif


yes it was suggested in another thread....

I also think bringing in Schumi to partner Rosberg for one final Hurrar...would really appeal to Michael. It also reunites him with Brawn and its clear Alonso is no fan of him staying in any role at Ferrari...

However.... Haug himself stated that he did not want to see an "all German team" and calls it an "International" team....

so....I am going to throw a real wild stone in the pond here as Rosbergs teamate.........

Kamui Kobayashi

You heard it here first! wink.gif
Anomnader
Will it be make or break time for Rosberg, he is leading the WCC team and must make an impression?

Many think the Williams was a better car then it showed in the drivers hands, next year might show if Rosberg can rise to the occasion or if he does fall short of greatness.
Brawn BGP 001
QUOTE (Anomnader @ Nov 16 2009, 22:00) *
Will it be make or break time for Rosberg, he is leading the WCC team and must make an impression?

Many think the Williams was a better car then it showed in the drivers hands, next year might show if Rosberg can rise to the occasion or if he does fall short of greatness.

Rosberg is an unkown, he has quite a few 4th and 5ths this year, but he bottled it his only chance of a victory this year. Was the Williams capable of podiums? We will never know.

Also Alexander Wurz and Kazuki Nakajima were very weak team-mates, Alex was past his prime in 1999 and Nakajima went downhill ever since his debut.
One
Yup Nico can crack under pressure perhaps, and we do not have any guarantee that Mercedes GP will be equipped with big budget developments.
santori
Alan Henry now says 'Jenson Button agrees to join McLaren on three-year, £6m-a-year deal'.
FlatOverCrest
I still dont undestand Ross's position or thinking?

As F1 World Champions, sponsorship is NOT an issue... So having built something with your name on it and done it so well.... why not try to build the next "Name brand" legacy in F1 like Williams. He was his own boss this year and he seemed to run the team absolutely superbly.... why the become the employee again of someone else.

Yes I know money plays a part, but Ross does not strike me as a man governed by money, He is definitely NOT a Bernie. He is obviously a genuinely nice fella that is very good at his chosen career.

I personally think its a real shame they decided to sell the majority stake.

Also.... what is interesting now is the whole "Virgin" situation. I suspect that Richard Branson threw his brand on the table, expecting Brawn to lap it up, with whatever deal Branson proposed...when in fact Brawn may have already had a better offer from Mercedes... hence why they suddenly walked awayit seems to go back Manor GP...

Interesting how the wheels turn.....
MikeTekRacing
QUOTE (FlatOverCrest @ Nov 17 2009, 00:20) *
Yes I know money plays a part, but Ross does not strike me as a man governed by money, He is definitely NOT a Bernie. He is obviously a genuinely nice fella that is very good at his chosen career.

maybe he's not a williams type either? smile.gif
he's just ross
FlatOverCrest
QUOTE (MikeTekRacing @ Nov 16 2009, 15:22) *
maybe he's not a williams type either? smile.gif
he's just ross


That he is.... I was superbly impressed with how during every interview in Brazil and Abu Dhabi that he made a key point in thanking all the team members, especially the guys at the factory and those they had to let go...

THAT right there is a lesson to all company CEO's and Leader's of how to gain respect and dedication from employee's, by simply recognising the employee's efforts, when the opportunity presents itself.

WORLDCLASS! up.gif
beute
QUOTE (santori @ Nov 16 2009, 23:19) *
Alan Henry now says 'Jenson Button agrees to join McLaren on three-year, £6m-a-year deal'.


why is he telling us that Daimler only bought 45%?
why would you believe him, If he cant even get that right?

am I missing something?
baddog
QUOTE (King Six @ Nov 17 2009, 06:15) *
I don't think the Silver McLaren had anything to do with Mercedes as they were with Merc for awhile but didn't go silver until relatively recently (2007 I think)


1997 was the first year of the silver mercedes/west livery. The silver 100% came from mercedes.

This is all most interesting.. next year is going to be a shakeup.

FlatOverCrest
QUOTE (beute @ Nov 16 2009, 15:31) *
why is he telling us that Daimler only bought 45%?
why would you believe him, If he cant even get that right?

am I missing something?


yes you are....that is exactly what Daimler bought, their partner "Aabar" has the remaining 30%.
Mia 01
QUOTE (santori @ Nov 16 2009, 23:19) *
Alan Henry now says 'Jenson Button agrees to join McLaren on three-year, £6m-a-year deal'.


Is he that shep?
aditya-now
QUOTE (Bishy @ Nov 16 2009, 21:33) *
I'm just upset that McLaren have lost the "Silver Arrows" tag, there was always something sexy when that was linked to the McLaren cars ambivalent.gif


Well, Mr.Bishop, since you joined the team as spin doctor it went all downhill in terms of public image...
Timstr11
With the likelyhood of Button not staying, I hope Kubica becomes available. Although I'm not yet convinced he's a top line driver, I see no better alternative at the moment.
lustigson
One of the voices in my head tells me that J.A.L. Button is staying at Mercedes née Brawn, and that McLaren will opt for A. Sutil alongside L.C. Hamilton.
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (lustigson @ Nov 18 2009, 18:29) *
One of the voices in my head tells me that J.A.L. Button is staying at Mercedes née Brawn, and that McLaren will opt for A. Sutil alongside L.C. Hamilton.

Does it sound suspiciously like Ross Brawn by any chance?
lustigson
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Nov 18 2009, 08:42) *
Does it sound suspiciously like Ross Brawn by any chance?

No, not really. But maybe Ross hears the same voices...wink.gif
BRK
QUOTE (baddog @ Nov 17 2009, 04:32) *
1997 was the first year of the silver mercedes/west livery. The silver 100% came from mercedes.


I think he meant the metallic chrome tint on the cars that began in 2006...


Anyway: looking forward to the 2010 Mercedes challenger. I was of the opinion that Brawn GP would falter next year until I read of Ross Brawn's mega gamble-I actually think they could be fighting at the very top,with McLaren,Ferrari,and maybe Red Bull as well.
Psymon
RealBrawnGP who afaik do have some insider contact with Brawn/Mercedes have tweeted:

Our sources are *still* saying Button will be at Brawn in 2010, despite Alan Henry's piece yesterday, and Kimi's exit. Tense. #F1
One
QUOTE (Psymon @ Nov 18 2009, 10:17) *
RealBrawnGP who afaik do have some insider contact with Brawn/Mercedes have tweeted:

Our sources are *still* saying Button will be at Brawn in 2010, despite Alan Henry's piece yesterday, and Kimi's exit. Tense. #F1


It should be. otherwise the machines are not running well at the stable.


...


Merc move by Brawn is logical because you must have great engine to win races, but selling as much as 75% was surprise. They could have opted by 49% with lesse money keeping autonomy, make more effort in attracting sponsors, work hard on the financial aspects. I do think that IF Brawn HAD a great marketing head they COULD have had the Sponsor rolling on to their door already this year, I mean why not?


Brawn team has unwise commercial head.
lustigson
QUOTE (One @ Nov 18 2009, 10:40) *
... They could have opted by 49% with lesse money keeping autonomy...

Which would make it no different from the McLaren deal -- Mercedes has a 40% share and no voice in the team's management -- and thus would make no sense to Daimler's board.
undersquare
QUOTE (One @ Nov 18 2009, 09:40) *
Merc move by Brawn is logical because you must have great engine to win races, but selling as much as 75% was surprise. They could have opted by 49% with lesse money keeping autonomy, make more effort in attracting sponsors, work hard on the financial aspects. I do think that IF Brawn HAD a great marketing head they COULD have had the Sponsor rolling on to their door already this year, I mean why not?

Brawn team has unwise commercial head.


I don't think Ross ever intended to stay independent, he's said so in fact. And Mercedes definitely would never have bought 49%, control and the Mercedes GP name is the whole point for them.
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (One @ Nov 18 2009, 20:40) *
I do think that IF Brawn HAD a great marketing head they COULD have had the Sponsor rolling on to their door already this year, I mean why not?

Sponsors didn't want to commit to a team when the future of the sport was in serious danger.
One
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Nov 18 2009, 11:48) *
Sponsors didn't want to commit to a team when the future of the sport was in serious danger.



The world's economic situation is the same for every other team. Still Williams, Mclaren, Ferrari.



Canon backed them up at Singapore.


QUOTE (undersquare @ Nov 18 2009, 11:09) *
I don't think Ross ever intended to stay independent, he's said so in fact.



I have not read that. Could you tell me when he said it?


QUOTE (lustigson @ Nov 18 2009, 10:53) *
Which would make it no different from the McLaren deal -- Mercedes has a 40% share and no voice in the team's management -- and thus would make no sense to Daimler's board.




40% and 49% is a huge difference in terms of influencing the team direction, isn't it If your arguments are true there is no difference in 30% or 49% share holding neither. THe rest of 51% consists of individuals in the case of Brawn, in such case if Ross turn his back to other and so on. The situation do make the team a bit unstable but if the non Merc guys stick together then the vote is done. Politics. with 40% or 30% this can be hardly achievable.


...
Gilles4Ever
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Nov 18 2009, 12:48) *
Sponsors didn't want to commit to a team when the future of the sport was in serious danger.

You state that like fact, you have a sorce to back up that statement?
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (Gilles4Ever @ Nov 18 2009, 21:56) *
You state that like fact, you have a sorce to back up that statement?

I read it in anaricle that was posted on Autosport back around the time of the European Grand Prix. I don't have a link because I don't have a subscription; anything older than a month is pushed back to subscription access only.
Psymon
QUOTE (Gilles4Ever @ Nov 18 2009, 10:56) *
You state that like fact, you have a sorce to back up that statement?


http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/77990 (Subscribers only I think)

To quote part of the article:

QUOTE
Talks with team backers accelerated over the summer once the new Concorde Agreement was in place - as it guaranteed the future of F1 and ended talk of a breakaway.

Team principal Ross Brawn said: "That was a log jam because sponsors wanted to know what the situation was, and things are freeing up. Everyone up the pit lane will find that things are now much better because we know what the commercial basis is for the future.

"We know we are going to be racing for the next three years at least in this championship - and I hope beyond, I hope we don't get into discussions about alternative championships again."
Captain Tightpants
Thanks, Psymon. That's the very article I was thinking of.
ensign14
So, Kimi to Merc?
Captain Tightpants
QUOTE (ensign14 @ Nov 18 2009, 22:24) *
So, Kimi to Merc?

No, Kimi to the nearest bar to drown his sorrows, followed shortly by retirement.
Psymon
QUOTE (Captain Tightpants @ Nov 18 2009, 11:23) *
Thanks, Psymon. That's the very article I was thinking of.


No probs wink.gif
Gilles4Ever
Ok yes that article but that hardly is the reason why there were no sponsors this year, which is what One was talking about. As I understood it, Honda would finance the team this year to a value less what sponsorship they got, so with finance for 2009 secured they didn't really have to hunt for sponsors immediately. So signing a big sponsor this year wouldn't have brought them more money as Honda would just have decreased their portion proportionately.
One
Thanx Gilles, The point.


Fry talked about, at least as far as it has been reported, that he tried to lure sponsors for 0 euro this year in order to attain further commitment for coming years. Nothing happened, now we can say this was not an appealing idea.

Instead of opting for 75 % the team could have opted to go for other strategy to keep on racing. Selling the 75% share to Mercedes the team achieve financial stability for the coming future and bring short time money to the share holders, but we are looking at the consequence of the driver who committed for the most of his potential years.


The team is facing to go on racing with no race winners on two cars next year(s) Isn"t it against the idea of going to racing?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.