QUOTE (Grenada @ Jul 26 2010, 19:12)

Yes, he clearly said in an interview in Turkey: "No I wasn't given a target lap time", but in Canada he said he was given a target lap time. I actually saw both interviews so there is no misconstruing there.
I reckoned that he denied the target lap times in Turkey to cover up why he sneaked past Hamilton. But Tim Goss had subsequently given quite detailed and specific interviews saying they were both given identical target lap times so maybe he had to admit it in the end otherwise he would be going against the team.
Actual Post-race discussion
QUOTE
Q: You don’t think that was a ruse to stop you battling?
JB:
I don’t know.
For about four or five laps beforehand they were saying you have to save fuel.
They didn’t put a lap time on it, they just said you have got to save a bit of fuel - that was quite early in the race I was told to do that, probably about lap 30.
I don’t think they expected the pace to be so fast but it was good pace, so that’s why we were told to save fuel I think.
Canada (ITV)
QUOTE
It was definitely a miscommunication," said Button.
I was there to race and Lewis was there to race, so it was the wrong wording.
I was told to save fuel and I was given a [target] lap time, and that was 1m31s. That was on lap 46, I passed him on lap 48, and I did a 1m30.85s, so almost a 1m31s but you can't judge the lap time exactly, and the next lap was a 1m31.9s.
So it wasn't that I went quicker to overtake him - Lewis had done a 1m33s so he was 2s off the lap time we were given.
So.. was the "They didn’t put a lap time on it" referring to to the race or "about lap 30" ??
Was it conceived lie, a mistake (ie forgotten), or a "paraphrase"(?) or was too much taken meaning taken out the statements?
Edit: Or journalistic garbage from a reporter who doesn't read things properly.