Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: HRT F1 - Hispania Racing F1 Team - Campos Meta Team (merged)
The AUTOSPORT Bulletin Board > Forums > Racing Comments
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140
wewantourdarbyback
QUOTE (gio66 @ Mar 28 2010, 21:07) *

Just looks short on downforce to me.
Meanbeakin
Watching at the track on turns 9 and 10 I noticed Karun's car kept fishtailing out of the corner.

Still a massive effort for them to finish a grand prix though, consiering where the whole operation was only a few weeks ago.
gio66
QUOTE (Ham's Cranes Ltd @ Mar 29 2010, 10:47) *
I see nothing wrong in that video confused.gif


No?

Watch the comparison with Webber (and probably most other cars).

Do you think it's normal to have oversteer at every turn? Is it normal to have such violent shocks (see the helmet) when Bruno enters the gears?
To go fast you have to go straight, not to swerve.
Baddoer
QUOTE (gio66 @ Mar 29 2010, 15:00) *
No?

Watch the comparison with Webber (and probably most other cars).

Do you think it's normal to have oversteer at every turn? Is it normal to have such violent shocks (see the helmet) when Bruno enters the gears?
To go fast you have to go straight, not to swerve.

That means nothing really. There also is nothing fundamentally wrong with car, they just need time to develop it.
gio66
QUOTE (Baddoer @ Mar 29 2010, 13:07) *
they just need time to develop it.


They DON'T develop it.
Baddoer
QUOTE (gio66 @ Mar 29 2010, 15:08) *
They DON'T develop it.

How do you knew that?
primer
Uh, Dallara are the ones who designed and built the car, they have the know how to develop it further. Hispania have at best got a racing team which can set up the car (with Dallara's help initially) and take it to track.

Dallara were asked to build an F1 car and -in a strict legal sense- they have done their job. The car passes FIA crash test and all regulations for entry into F1 championship, but that's about it. Unless Hispania can 'show them the money' why would Dallara waste their own time and money on refining this excuse of an F1 car?

Sorry, I do not have much hope from the team. For sure they will understand how to set up the car and make the most of the Bridgestone tires with more experience. This should certainly improve their lap times, but they are just too far behind to beat Virgin and Lotus over the season. What the teams need is a Mallya type character who does not mind spending tens of millions to improve the team. Perhaps Flavio can use this team to make a comeback in F1?
DanardiF1
QUOTE (wewantourdarbyback @ Mar 29 2010, 09:58) *
Just looks short on downforce to me.


Exactly... Senna looks to be driving that car very well, hitting the apexes with a car that is that twitchy is admirable!
Baddoer
I'm also think HRT need experienced driver to setup their car. It will be very difficult to do without knowlege about how proper car should perform.
froggy22
QUOTE (gio66 @ Mar 29 2010, 11:00) *
No?

Watch the comparison with Webber (and probably most other cars).

Do you think it's normal to have oversteer at every turn? Is it normal to have such violent shocks (see the helmet) when Bruno enters the gears?
To go fast you have to go straight, not to swerve.

comparing it to a car that is glued to the track....

it looks fine, just lacks a bit of downforce that they will no doubt gain by the end of the season at least. and anyway, i prefer to see a car driven on the edge than a car that seems too easy to drive
primer
QUOTE (Baddoer @ Mar 29 2010, 11:42) *
I'm also think HRT need experienced driver to setup their car. It will be very difficult to do without knowlege about how proper car should perform.

Both Bruno and Karun (alongside their race engineers, of course) have set up GP2 cars plenty of times.
Dino Scuderia
which is not an F1 car...
Baddoer
QUOTE (primer @ Mar 29 2010, 15:49) *
Both Bruno and Karun (alongside their race engineers, of course) have set up GP2 cars plenty of times.

GP2 is not F1, you know. They need someone like Heidfield, I think.
primer
QUOTE (Dino Scuderia @ Mar 29 2010, 11:50) *
which is not an F1 car...

QUOTE (Baddoer @ Mar 29 2010, 11:52) *
GP2 is not F1, you know.

Both offer pretty much the same adjustability. Principles are the same, it is not as if F1 cars operate in some special universe with its own brand of physics.


QUOTE (Baddoer @ Mar 29 2010, 11:52) *
They need someone like Heidfield, I think.

L.O.L. Drivers role is so exaggerated anyway.
Baddoer
QUOTE (primer @ Mar 29 2010, 16:03) *
Both offer pretty much the same adjustability. Principles are the same, it is not as if F1 cars operate in some special universe with its own brand of physics.



L.O.L. Drivers role is so exaggerated anyway.

Experience is what matters. Bruno & Karun are green, Heidfield is not. Period.
highdownforce
Good job with Karun!
____

QUOTE (Levike @ Mar 28 2010, 05:28) *
What happened to Senna ? He was in a good position then suddenly he was out....

Problems with the gearbox.
____

QUOTE (Baddoer @ Mar 29 2010, 08:10) *
How do you knew that?

Words coming from Italy and Spain saying that Dallara will not develop the car to a further baseline.
____

QUOTE (Baddoer @ Mar 29 2010, 08:52) *
GP2 is not F1, you know. They need someone like Heidfield, I think.

There were some talks about using Fisichella to test the car.
____

QUOTE
First HRT F1 Team race finish - Qantas’s Australian Grand Prix [HispaniaF1Team.com]
Melbourne - Albert Park, Sunday, March 28, 2010
Weather: overcast/ wet by intermittence - air 27°, track 27°
Driver (Chassis) Race
Karun Chandhok F110-01 #20 14
Bruno Senna F110-02 #21 DNF

Karun Chandhok and Bruno Senna made good starts in today’s Qantas Australian Grand Prix, Bruno jumping from 21st to 14th and Karun pushing from 22nd to 16th. Unfortunately Bruno’s race ended after five laps due to hydraulic problems. Karun had a reliable run despite two offs and destroying the floor, which affected the car’s aerodynamics. He scored the team’s first finish with 14th place. Dr.

Colin Kolles (Team Principal): This result, having Karun ending up the race in 14th position is a great step forward. We reached the goal with one of the two cars in the finish. I´m sorry for Bruno because he did a good job all weekend. Karun Chandhok drove the team’s first full race and finished in 14th position the first race for the team, what was really fantastic, especially with these difficult conditions. The team did a great job and brought two very competitive cars on the grid. Now we will keep on pushing and just focus on our preparation for Malaysia, where our season will really begin.

Karun Chandhok: A great thank to the team. To finish was very difficult today, and all the more satisfying because of that. I dedicate this race result to all the mechanics and engineers who worked so hard since Bahrain, without any pre-season testing. This is a fantastic day for the team and a great step forward. I am proud to have ended our first race. At the start, I could see a big accident developing ahead of me and tried to keep to the inside to avoid trouble. I was able to avoid getting caught up in the aftermath and was in 16th position. I pitted on my 8th lap like the Ferraris and it was comfortable until mid-race where I was 15th. Later I changed tires on my 51st lap, only 7 laps before the end. We achieved the best result we could do today. We have to keep pushing and working and we will manage to finish even higher.

Bruno Senna: I didn´t intend my second Grand Prix to end with an hydraulic failure, but that´s racing! I made a good start and was in 14th after the big crash in front.
It’s fantastic for the team to make it to the finish and we have got a great deal of data to work from for Malaysia. I hope we can finish with two cars next race.

____

QUOTE
Bruno: [it's like] the rear is one car and the front is another [Tazio.com.br]

"I had a good start, I overtook a car at the start, but I was not really fighting for position because things were complicated in the race. My goal was to finish. Our struggle was not with the other cars, but with our own problems. "

"When the safety car came in, the balance of the car was not ideal. On the restart I lost hydraulic pressure and had to stop."

"We're setting the car a little more, but more needs to develop. We must now pass an equipment that makes the setup of the car. For while the rear is one car and the front is another, especially on bumpy tracks like this here .

"Of course I'd be fighting position, but have to get used to the idea that I am working to improve the car. With patience we'll get there. It's frustrating when car breaks down, because you want to learn, but my mileage has not passed 300 km ".

"If we get something between Malaysia and Shanghai would be a great help, but things will be the largest in the European part. Now we have to go for it and will certainly be very different condition from there. There must be a little less difficult than here with ripples, temperature and so on. "
Dino Scuderia
QUOTE (primer @ Mar 29 2010, 13:03) *
Both offer pretty much the same adjustability. Principles are the same, it is not as if F1 cars operate in some special universe with its own brand of physics.



L.O.L. Drivers role is so exaggerated anyway.

No they don't, the set-up options between a 1 car series like gp2 and and F1 are so immense you cant even compare..
MattPete
QUOTE (Dino Scuderia @ Mar 29 2010, 06:35) *
No they don't, the set-up options between a 1 car series like gp2 and and F1 are so immense you cant even compare..


Yeah, like one series has square wheels and the other series floats on a cushion of air!

F1 Fanboydom > engineering
gio66
QUOTE (primer @ Mar 29 2010, 13:30) *
Unless Hispania can 'show them the money' why would Dallara waste their own time and money on refining this excuse of an F1 car?


Exactly. up.gif
gio66
QUOTE (highdownforce @ Mar 29 2010, 14:53) *
"For while the rear is one car and the front is another, especially on bumpy tracks like this here"


This is what we see in the videoclip.
highdownforce
If car setup wasn't such a big thing, 7xWDC Schumacher would not need to change cars with Barrichelo.
Of course Karun and Bruno are able to help to set-up a car, but a experienced driver is able to compare it to past cars setups, and this more experienced driver is able to setup a car in a faster fashion.

Edit:
QUOTE (gio66 @ Mar 29 2010, 13:48) *
This is what we see in the videoclip.

It is indeed.
CSquared
QUOTE (primer @ Mar 29 2010, 04:30) *
Uh, Dallara are the ones who designed and built the car, they have the know how to develop it further. Hispania have at best got a racing team which can set up the car (with Dallara's help initially) and take it to track.

Dallara were asked to build an F1 car and -in a strict legal sense- they have done their job. The car passes FIA crash test and all regulations for entry into F1 championship, but that's about it. Unless Hispania can 'show them the money' why would Dallara waste their own time and money on refining this excuse of an F1 car?

I'd be really interested to hear the internal discussions going on at Dallara. I'd imagine there's some in the hardnosed buisness camp, saying "they can't expect us to develop if they don't pay for it," some marketing guy saying, "improving the car will be good for Dallara's image and help in future deals and promotions," some manager guy saying, "improving the car would be good for morale and make people proud," some real racers/engineers just itching to improve and test the race car they've made, and probably some more.
gio66
QUOTE (CSquared @ Mar 29 2010, 19:09) *
I'd be really interested to hear the internal discussions going on at Dallara. I'd imagine there's some in the hardnosed buisness camp, saying "they can't expect us to develop if they don't pay for it," some marketing guy saying, "improving the car will be good for Dallara's image and help in future deals and promotions," some manager guy saying, "improving the car would be good for morale and make people proud," some real racers/engineers just itching to improve and test the race car they've made, and probably some more.


Unfortunately not.
The Campos car was a job order, no more no less. Dallara can take satisfaction in being able to obtain payment of work performed, considering what has happened.

I know that until Campos paid work, things went well. The February Dallara online magazine was originally focused on the F1 car. When it became clear that the problems were irreversible, the magazine has been completely rewrite.
Now, if Carabante Kolles want to develop HRT, they should go in Varano with money in hand, otherwise... back home, please.
And, AFAIK, none of them can/want to spend money at this time. I begin to think that HRT does not participate in most of free practice in order not to spend money.
highdownforce
QUOTE (gio66 @ Mar 29 2010, 14:48) *
The February Dallara online magazine was originally focused on the F1 car. When it became clear that the problems were irreversible, the magazine has been completely rewrite.

I was puzzled about that at the time. [ Here is the link to the magazine ]

I had tumbled over the January's edition when searching for info on the Dallara web site and because of this, I've thought that the February or maybe March edition would be focused on the project.
When I saw the cover, I've thought that was quite strange to have the Indy car there, but there was an article about F1. So I had proceed to read the article, but there wasn't a mention about the Dallara, only about drivers that have raced in GP2 and WSR and are at F1 this year.

The most intriguing bit is that Bruno is not listed in the magazine. I clearly suggests that Dallara was not considering viable that the, at the time, Campos Meta 1 would hit the track.
Petroltorque
I think there is way too much unfounded speculation being put forward. Chandok has gone on record as saying the definitive car will arrive by Barcelona and Dallara have not gone on record saying that their contract to develop the car has been terminarted. Unfortunately I'm old enough to remember Dallara's first foray into F1 with Scuderia Italia, and that was a very capable chassis.
This car has shown clear promise. The team are still tuning suspension geometry to aero profile as seen by the improvement between Practice 3 and Qualifying in Adelaide.
The true pecking order among the new teams will be more clearly seen in Malaysia, where aero, braking stability and low traction grip will be severely tested. I for one would be more happy with HRT's postion than Virgin's. An unproven all CFD approach, poor reliabilty and a fuel tank thats too small. Having to redesign that is hardly likely to optimise an established design.
highdownforce
QUOTE (Petroltorque @ Mar 29 2010, 15:14) *
I think there is way too much unfounded speculation being put forward. Chandok has gone on record as saying the definitive car will arrive by Barcelona and Dallara have not gone on record saying that their contract to develop the car has been terminarted.

IIRC, Bruno has also hinted that [there'd be some kind of Barcelona spec], but I'd reserve some thoughts about those not being too far from becoming the last updates.
If the three years deal is really buried, I'd not expect many developments through this year, as they would probably focus on a 2011 spec after midi-season.


Or... not everything is carved in stone and there are still many promises and threats, by both parties, waiting to materialize themselves.
gio66
QUOTE (highdownforce @ Mar 29 2010, 20:04) *
I had tumbled over the January's edition when searching for info on the Dallara web site and because of this, I've thought that the February or maybe March edition would be focused on the project.


Sorry, my mistake.

I was talking about the January edition in which Mr.Dallara said:
"I can say with pride that we have done a good job in design and development, all safety tests have been passed and production has gone ahead.
Unfortunately, factors outside our control are slowing the process down, but I'm confident that we can find solutions so that our work is not lost."


http://www.italiaracing.net/mag_dallara/201001/eng/index.asp

This was the only mention about the F1 car.
highdownforce
QUOTE (gio66 @ Mar 29 2010, 16:00) *
Sorry, my mistake.

I was talking about the January edition in which Mr.Dallara said:
"I can say with pride that we have done a good job in design and development, all safety tests have been passed and production has gone ahead.
Unfortunately, factors outside our control are slowing the process down, but I'm confident that we can find solutions so that our work is not lost."


http://www.italiaracing.net/mag_dallara/201001/eng/index.asp

This was the only mention about the F1 car.

No problem!
For the moment, I guess it would be the only mention of the car at all.
gio66
QUOTE (highdownforce @ Mar 29 2010, 21:03) *
For the moment, I guess it would be the only mention of the car at all.


Yes, but that issue was to be originally based on the F1 car, AFAIK.
highdownforce
QUOTE (gio66 @ Mar 29 2010, 16:33) *
Yes, but that issue was to be originally based on the F1 car, AFAIK.

Exactly.
And now there's nothing about it, and maybe there will never be something about it on the magazine. down.gif
It's a shame because I believe w'd had some technical informations about the car.
highdownforce
"Two seconds in the package", if this is possible, I'd say that the Hispania won't be able to catch the Lotus, but it put the team ahead of the Virgin easily.
gio66
I hope so.
NightProwler
By the time they catch up id say lotus will have outdeveloped them given HRTs non existant budget.

Id like to see them win the new car battle but they need cash.
highdownforce
As I've said, It would be really difficult, not to say almost impossible, to catch up the Lotus in the current scenario.
Specially when we see the Malaysian team sign new sponsors.

Also, I'd say that we've to wait until the 7th of May to realize if there will be any considerable changes for the weekend in Montmelo. If nothing changes at that moment, probably, nothing will change at all.
alfa1
QUOTE (highdownforce @ Mar 31 2010, 03:57) *
"Two seconds in the package", if this is possible, I'd say that the Hispania won't be able to catch the Lotus, but it put the team ahead of the Virgin easily.



Two seconds easy. Problem is though that all the other new teams also have another two seconds in the package.
Its the final few tenths to match the top teams that always cost the millions to find, and most never do.
Petroltorque
I doubt that Lotus/Virgin have an easy 2 second gain in their chassis'. I'm assuming that Kolles is referring to the refinement of setup and changing of mechanical components not up to spec.
The problem Facing Lotus and Virgin is their performance curve is already starting to plateau, their time gain from Free practice 3 to qualifying in Australia was 0.7s compared to an average of 4s for Hispania.
I'm looking forward to Sepang which will be the first real test for all the F1 teams!
glorius&victorius
can anyone find the laptimes of Karun? I want to see how he progressed during the race....was he consistent, did he get gradually faster?

thanks!
Barry Boor
The lap times will, of necessity, be very irregular. When you see how much the slower cars have to ease off when being lapped, I'd bet their times would vary by as much as 10 seconds a lap.

This would tend to make the driver look inconsistent - unfairly so.
froggy22
Karun's Fastest lap was only less than a second off Glock and 1.4 off the Heikki's Lotus. i think its fair to say they are catching up
highdownforce
QUOTE (glorius&victorius @ Mar 31 2010, 06:56) *
can anyone find the laptimes of Karun? I want to see how he progressed during the race....was he consistent, did he get gradually faster?

thanks!

Take a look at here [link]
gio66
QUOTE (highdownforce @ Mar 31 2010, 19:15) *
Take a look at here


Or here. [link]

Select any driver.
highdownforce
From earlier today:

QUOTE
"We will get to them [Lotus and Virgin], it's just a matter of time" [Grande Prêmio]

"Only when we start tinkering with the bumpers we'd be able to establish a base setup. Here and in China, we must have patience, and try to gain mileage and improve the reliability of the cars,".

"One tip that plugs into the hoses that connect to the gearbox broke [on Sunday race], probably by a collapse of the material from the floor hitting the ground. That part was aluminum but was replaced by a steel now. Actually, this could have been done already in Australia, but we had no indication of a problem. Chandhok also ran with an equal part and [luckly] completed the race. "

“The bigger the number of variables [that rain could bring to the Malaysian race], bigger the chance of happening something unexpected that might benefit us”.



Edit: Btw, on a side note, some pictures of Bruno and Karun having some fun at Kuala Lumpur: [Gallery]
BiH
is this all question of money then.
if they bring new spec chassis to barcelona it will be dallara evolution?
highdownforce
QUOTE (BiH @ Mar 31 2010, 18:34) *
is this all question of money then.
if they bring new spec chassis to barcelona it will be dallara evolution?

If it happens, it will be a Dallara.
But it doesn't mean that this evolution was already paid before the start of the season.

Edit: A chash flush to buy carbon prts instead of steel would already be beneficial for the team.
alfa1
QUOTE (gio66 @ Apr 1 2010, 05:00) *
Or here. [link]
Select any driver.



So splitting Karuns race into 4 parts, his best lap times in each quarter of the race are...
Laps 1- 13 1:38.908
Laps 14-26 1:38.164
Laps 27-39 1:37.874
Laps 40-53 1:35.046 Improvement of 3.862 seconds

So yes, he got quicker during the race.
But of course everyone did as the fuel came off and the car got lighter.

We can compare to some other random driver, such as Rubens Barrichello.
Laps 1- 14 1:34.227
Laps 15-29 1:32.131
Laps 30-43 1:30.254
Laps 44-58 1:29.211 Improvement of 5.016 seconds


It was a very disruptive race for Karun. I was at the track and had his radio frequency plugged into my scanner, and on almost every lap without exception he was being lapped by traffic. His race was a continual stream of radio messages like "Alguersuari and Schumacher, 4 seconds behind [you]"
Hardly conducive to setting a race rhythm.


Meanbeakin
Karun also had a race spin (Happened right in front of where I was sitting).

For a guy who'd done bugger all laps to finish race distance is quite an achievement. Be interesting to see who does better out of him and Bruno, I get the feeling Chandhok is no chump.
lafitek
senna destroyed chandhok in 2008 in GP2 (As Frentzen destroyed schumacher in 1989 in german f3) ....but F1 is different
in Sepang some Spanish girl destroyed Bruno...
GhostR
QUOTE (alfa1 @ Mar 28 2010, 23:06) *
1:28.358 = Fastest lap, by Webber
1:35.045 = Karun's fastest lap.

Thats 107.6%
A few years back, 107% was considered to be the official benchmark for competitiveness. Why would anyone not think that with a few more hours of running time, the HRT team cant gain another 0.6%? smile.gif


Worth considering as well that Webber set that time on a second set of the softer option while chasing Hamilton trying to catch back up to the Ferrari's and Kubica. He was on a charge.

Chandhok will have set his time while doing his best to conserve the car and bring it home for a finish with nothing to gain by going for pace.

I think give them a few races, even without money, and they'll be comfortably within that 107% time and proving the car deserves to be on the track. They can do that purely with setup refinements and increasing driver experience. If they can find the money to pay Dallara to develop the car, even better - you can clearly see they must be losing chunks of time with that front wing alone.
highdownforce
You guys remember this quote?
QUOTE
"[it's like] the rear is one car and the front is another"


There was some explanation behind it. [link]

His car was using a different fuel tank than the other chassis, and a similar one was installed for this race.
QUOTE
"This new tank has divisions in its bottom that prevent the movement of gasoline when accelerating, and especially under braking"
"In Bahrain and Australia, it looked like there was a 330 pound fat man dancing in the car at the start of the races. Imagine just stop with all that weight moving "


About the weather:
QUOTE
"One thing is racing in the rain, another is to confront these floods which usually fall around here. If it rains on Sunday the same way that it rained today, you can't have race"


Edit: Weight conversion.
gio66
Very interesting.

Thanks Thiago. up.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.